Manuel Pichardo Marcano (Fisk/Vanderbilt)
Karan Jani
Detection of the most massive white dwarf mergers with LILA
Type Ia Supernova
- Type Ia:
- I: No H or He
- a: strong SiII
- Explosion of C/O WD
- Chandrasekhar Mass (Mch = 1.4M⊙)
- Cosmological standard candles
- Hubble Tension
- Output to Galaxies
- Heavy-element factories
- Single Degenerate (WD + Non-degenerate):
- Symbiotics: WD + RG
- Novae: WD + MS
- Supersoft X-ray sources
- WD + Hot subdwarfs
- Double Degenerate (WD + WD):
- GW-driven
- Third-Body-Induced Collisions
Progenitor Problem
Caltech/NASA
No Consensus on Main Mechanism:
EM + GW can solve this problem
- A lot of Open Questions!
- Accretion-induced collapse (AIC)?
- Formation of Neutron Star
- Detonation mechanism?
- A range of Masses:
- sub-Mch, Mch, super-Mch
- A range of Luminisities:
- sub-, normal, super- luminous
Double Degenerates
Gravitational Waves Sources
A multi-messenger approach promises to help solve these problems
Taubenberger 2007
LISA and LILA
- LISA:
- Millihertz
- SNe Ia progenitors in the Milky way
- LILA:
- More sensitive to higher masses at greater distances (> 0.1 Hz)
- Probe the merger in other galaxies
Methods
- Evolve WDs with masses 1.3 to 1.4 M⊙
- 4 years before merging:
- Merge: Lower Mass Fills Roche Lobe
- Calculate SNR for LISA and Gravitational-Wave Lunar Observatory for Cosmology (GLOC) as a LILA proxy
LISA
GLOC
LISA vs GLOC
LISA vs GLOC
Best Case Scenario
SNR = 15 at 10 Mpc
Best Case Scenario
SNR = 15 at 10 Mpc
1.4 + 1.4 M⊙
LILA
- LILA will help a lot:
- 0.1 Hz vs 0.25 Hz (GLOC)
Future Work for the Paper
- Expected SN Rates
- What Masses and combinations of WDs can we expect?
- ONe + CO WD?
- CO + CO WD?
- What would a none detection from LILA mean?
LILAJuly
By mmarcano22
LILAJuly
- 76