Interdisciplinarity to tackle the world's leading cause of death

What does it mean to advance science?

  • 2.000.000 million scientific papers each year
  • 30.000 scientific journals

Too many scientific papers...

Publishing papers is necessary:

  • Grants, positions, promotions, status...  
                                   

This could lead to:

  • fractioning (“salami slicing” data sets to the smallest publishable unit)
  • surreptitiously re-using data in multiple publications
  • duplicating papers
  • publishing results that are preliminary or incomplete
  • underemphasizing limitations
  • making exaggerated claims
  • data fabrication, falsification and plagiarism

How to make an impact in this enormous mass of science?

But increase of number of papers is mainly due to growing number of researchers

Too many scientific papers...

Replication crisis:

  • Amgen, a US biotech company:
    replicate 11% of 53 high-impact cancer research studies
  • German pharmaceutical company Bayer:
    replicate 36% of 64 studies.
  • John Ioannidis, MD, Professor of Medicine  and Statistics at Stanford University:
    replicate 44%
    of 45 of the most influential clinical studies

How to make sure your research is reproducible?

Too many scientific papers...

What happens with your results after they get published?

  • Maybe you have written code, a thesis manuscript but get your PhD and nobody uses your code, reads your thesis code is not well documented
     
  • No follow-up of your project
     
  • Paper gets forgotten in the mass of papers produced
     
  • You move on to the next project

How to make sure your research is sustainable?

Too many scientific papers...

  • A lot of the research is incremental
  • We like to stay in our comfort zone
  • Taking a leap, requires time and effort and slows publication rate
  • Combining things which have never been combined can often be good way forward...

Interdisciplinary research is a way to do new and exciting things no one has done before you

How can we make big leaps in science?

 

  • Reproducible
  • Sustainable
  • Novel -> interdisciplinary work?

Create impact!

My scientific journey so far...

  • Master degree in physics (UGent, 2004-2007)

  • PhD in theoretical physics (UGent + long research stays Brazil, 2007-2001)

Phd in physics

Phd in physics

  • Wanted to do applied research
  • Interest in Biophysics grew when I met a newly appointed professor in my university
  • Wrote and received an FWO post-doc position in a completely new field

Started computer modeling of the heart

Post-doc in computer modeling of the heart

  • Research stay in Utrecht Medical center
  • Wanted to check if my modeling was realistic
  • Investigated experiments of a certain lethal arrhythmia called Torsade de Pointes (TdP)  in a dog model

Needle experiments

Induce TdP and investigate mechanism

preclinical research:

  • in silico
  • animal models

Post-doc 2: computer modeling and analysis of experiments

Had to find a new way

Started to integrate network theory to analyze the data, a whole different branch of science

It was not possible to analyze the dog data with the known methods in the literature because the data was too sparse and too noisy

Post-doc 2: computer modeling and analysis of experiments

I followed the Interdisciplinary Program in Healthcare Innovation, gave me many new insights!

Post-doc 2: computer modeling and analysis of experiments

Applied the same idea to clinical data

And it worked!

One year internal grant

Oct 2019: Became assistant professor UGent (Tenure Track)

Obtained ERC starting grant for 1.5 milion euros

Febr 2021: Became associate professor UGent (Permanent)

Start of Professorship

Cardiac arrhythmia: some basics

Cardiac arrhythmia: 15% - 20% of all deaths

How does the heart work

Basis of cardiac arrhythmia

Treatment cardiac arrhythmia

Ablatie: littekenweefsel aanbrengen om zo de hartritmestoornis te stoppen

Treatment cardiac arrhythmia

Types of arrhythmia

  • Atrial tachycardia
  • Atrial fibrillation

 

  • Ventricular tachycardia
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Torsade de Pointes
  • regular
  • irregular

Atrial tachycardia

Measurements give rise to a color map.

Needs to be interpreted manually: challenging and operator dependent.

Local activation time

Atrial tachycardia: case study

Network theory as a new way to analyze cardiac arrhythmia

 

Search algorithm

Facebook

Brain

Network theory has many applications...

But was not very often applied to the heart, although it is a very natural idea to transform cardiac waves into a directed network

Novel idea

Rotating electrical waves are just the cycles in our network!

DGM actually works on patient data

DGM: a software package to analyze reentry/focals automatically

Computational data

  • Any subset

Input

  1. Coordinates of the measuring electrodes
  2. Local Activation Times (or signal to derive LAT)

Spatial organization of datapoints is not required!

Experimental data

  • Needle data
  • Socket data
  • Grid data
  • ...

Clinical data

  • Point by point data
  • PentaRay
  • Basket Catether
  • ...

Topology added to the mix

 

MV

LPV

RPV

Anatomy of the left atrium: 3 natural holes

MV

LPV

RPV

Anatomy of the left and right atrium

SVC

IVC

TV

MV

LPV

RPV

Scar creates additional holes

Index theorem (> 20 years old!)

 

  • Each hole has an index: +1, -1 or 0
     
  • Sum of the indexes has to be zero

Ablation: connect the critical boundaries

CB:

CB:

NCB: 0

Publication

 

  • Reproducible
  • Sustainable
  • Novel -> interdisciplinary work?

Create impact!

Some difficulties with interdisciplinary research:

  • You have to learn to speak with other fields
  • Medical doctors:
    different language: different words for the same thing: different ontologies
    takes time -> willing to invest this time
    share data - privacy issues (GDPR)
                      - material transfer agreements (MTAs)
  • Network specialists:
    again other language, invest time in learning new subject
  • You have to adapt your style to the journal, grant panel of choice (ERC)
  • Explain things simple: consortium partners understand
  • Listen to what the doctors want, develop your method for them (their patients), not for yourself

But also a lot of fun and very challenging!

What did I learn?

i3h

By Nele Vandersickel