Representation of mobility demand in agent-based transport simulation

Sebastian Hörl

22 November 2024

ENPC

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016800172/

The street in 1900

The street today

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atlanta_75.85.jpg

  • Autonomous Mobility

  • Mobility as a Service

  • Mobility on Demand

  • Electrification

  • Aerial Mobility

Julius Bär / Farner

The street of tomorrow?

Julius Bär / Farner

I. Transport simulation

Classic transport planning

  • Zones
  • Flows
  • Peak hours
  • User groups

Aggregated

Agent-based models

0:00 - 8:00

08:30 - 17:00

17:30 - 0:00

0:00 - 9:00

10:00 - 17:30

17:45 - 21:00

22:00 - 0:00

  • Discrete locations
  • Individual travelers
  • Individual behaviour
  • Whole day analysis

Disaggregated

Icons on this and following slides: https://fontawesome.com

MATSim

  • Flexible, extensible and well-tested open-source transport simulation framework
     
  • Used by many research groups and companies all over the world
     
  • Extensions for parking behaviour, signal control, location choice, freight, ...

matsim-org/matsim-libs

MATSim

Synthetic demand

MATSim

Mobility simulation

Synthetic demand

MATSim

Decision-making

10:00 - 17:30

17:45 - 21:00

22:00 - 0:00

Mobility simulation

Synthetic demand

MATSim

Decision-making

Mobility simulation

Synthetic demand

MATSim

Decision-making

Mobility simulation

Analysis

Synthetic demand

https://pixabay.com/en/zurich-historic-center-churches-933732/

II. AMoD in Zurich

Cost structures?

User preferences?

System impact?

Cost Calculator for automated mobility

Stated preference survey

MATSim simulation

1

2

3

What do we know about automated taxis?

What do we know about automated taxis?

Bösch, P.M., F. Becker, H. Becker and K.W. Axhausen (2018) Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services, Transport Policy, 64, 76-91

What do we know about automated taxis?

Felix Becker, Institute for Transport Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich.

VTTS

13 CHF/h


 

AMoD

Taxi

19 CHF/h

 

 

Conventional

Car

12 CHF/h
 

 

Public

Transport

AMoD

Car by Adrien Coquet from the Noun Project

Bus by Simon Farkas from the Noun Project

Wait by ibrandify from the Noun Project

VTTS

13 CHF/h
 

 

AMoD

Taxi

19 CHF/h

 

 

Conventional

Car

12 CHF/h
 

 

Public

Transport

 
21 CHF/h

 


32 CHF/h

AMoD

Car by Adrien Coquet from the Noun Project

Bus by Simon Farkas from the Noun Project

Wait by ibrandify from the Noun Project

Model structure

Cost calculator

Plan modification

Discrete Mode Choice Extension

Mobility simulation

Prediction

Price

Trips

- Utilization

- Empty distance, ...

- Travel times

- Wait times, ...

Fleet sizing with dynamic demand

Fleet sizing with dynamic demand

Fleet sizing with dynamic demand

Visualisation

Automated taxi

Pickup

Dropoff

Hörl, S., F. Becker and K.W. Axhausen (2020) Automated Mobility on Demand: A comprehensive simulation study of cost, behaviour and system impact for Zurich

Hörl, S., F. Becker and K.W. Axhausen (2020) Automated Mobility on Demand: A comprehensive simulation study of cost, behaviour and system impact for Zurich

13% reduction in vehicles

100% increase in VKT

Hörl, S., F. Becker and K.W. Axhausen (2020) Automated Mobility on Demand: A comprehensive simulation study of cost, behaviour and system impact for Zurich

100% increase in VKT

Hörl, S., F. Becker and K.W. Axhausen (2020) Automated Mobility on Demand: A comprehensive simulation study of cost, behaviour and system impact for Zurich

Other aspects

Hörl, S., C. Ruch, F. Becker, E. Frazzoli and K.W. Axhausen (2019) Fleet operational policies for automated mobility: a simulation assessment for Zurich, Transportation Research: Part C, 102, 20-32.

Fleet control

Operational constraints

Spatial constraints

Intermodality

Pooling

III. Demand data

https://pixabay.com/en/paris-eiffel-tower-night-city-view-3296269/

Macroscopic four-step model

Generation

Distribution

Mode choice

Assignment

  • Classic way of demand modeling
     
  • Four steps making use of different data sources
     
  • From static to more dynamic mobility decisions
     
  • Multiple possible feedback loops (most common example here)

Macroscopic four-step model

Generation

Distribution

Mode choice

Assignment

  • Where do trips appear?
  • What is the destination of the trips?
  • What transport mode is used?
  • What congestion is caused?

Macroscopic four-step model

Generation

Distribution

Mode choice

Assignment

Travel demand

Travel supply

  • Characterizes the need for mobility in the population for economic activity, leisure, ... 
  • Means that allow for mobility
  • Road infrastructure, rail network, ...

Macroscopic four-step model

Generation

Distribution

Mode choice

Assignment

Travel demand

Travel supply

  • Characterizes the need for mobility in the population for economic activity, leisure, ... 
  • Means that allow for mobility
  • Road infrastructure, rail network, ...

Equilibrium

  • Given limited capacity,
    how is the system used?

I) Trip Generation

  • Goal: Define statistically where trips starts, i.e. where they are "generated" or produced
     
  • Focus on peak hours in 4S, e.g. morning peak and focus on commuting activity
     
  • Either making use of direct data (e.g. from surveys) or based on population data, land use information, ...

Number of inabitants in Île-de-France

I) Trip Generation

  • May be per homogeneous user group, e.g.
    • Single-person households
    • Multi-persons households
      without children
    • Multi-person households
      with children
    • Households with retired persons
       
  • Possible to use statistical models
O_{s,g} = f(X_s)

Generated trips

in zone s in group g

Trip generation model

Model inputs

I) Trip Generation

  • Example: Linear model based on socioprofessional category (CS):
    • Employee
    • Worker
    • Retired
    • ...
       
  • Do we have reference number of trips for some of the zones? Then we can create a model from this formula! Example: Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
f(X) = \sum_{CS} \lambda_{CS} \cdot x_{CS}

Model parameters (linear factors)

Census data (inhabitants)

\text{min}_\Lambda \sum_s (f(X_s|\Lambda) - \hat O_s)^2

Reference data

II) Trip Distribution

  • Goal: Given the produced trips with their origin zone, define where they end = distribute the trips over a set of potential destination

Number of daily commutes arriving from 13th arrondissement

II) Trip Distribution

  • Based on trip generation, we want to predict the number of trips going from zone s to zone t
     
  • Various ways to model flows between zones
    • Gravity model
    • Discrete choice model
    • Maximum entropy
       
  • Can be formulated per group g.
F_{s,t} = f(X_s, X_t)

Flow between s and t

Model

O1 ... ... On
D1
... Fst
...
Dn
O_s
D_t

III) Mode choice

  • Goal: Given the infrastructure and the generated OD trips, which mode of transport should be used for them.
     
  • Expressed as mode share: How many percent of the trips on a OD relation are performed with mode m?
P[m]
m \in \{ car, pt, ... \}
\sum_m P[m] = 1
P[m] \geq 0

III) Mode choice

  • Utility maximization is important concept in transport planning: Given a set of choices (modes, destinations, ...) we can assign a utility v to each alternative k.
     
  • We assume rational decision makers that always want to choose the alternative with the highest utility.
     
  • Homo oeconomicus
v_k = \beta^T X
k^* = \text{arg max}_k \{ v_1, ..., v_k, ... v_K \}
  • Example: Choice between two public transport connections
v_k = \beta_\text{travelTime} \cdot x_{k, \text{travelTime}} + \beta_\text{interchanges} \cdot x_{k, \text{interchanges}}

Connection A

x_{A, \text{travelTime}} = 20\ \text{min}

Connection B

x_{B, \text{travelTime}} = 30\ \text{min}
x_{B, \text{interchanges}} = 0
x_{A, \text{interchanges}} = 1

-0.6

-1.0

-0.6 * 20 - 1.0 * 1 = -13

-0.6 * 30 - 1.0 * 0 = -19

Connection A is better alternative.

III) Mode choice

III) Mode choice

  • Example: Mode choice model

( IV: Assignment )

  • Last step of 4S model

     
  • What are resulting flows on the roads?
     
  • What are the resulting travel times?

( IV: Assignment )

  • Example: Two routes
    • Travellers on Route A:
    • Travellers on Route B:
    • Total travellers from S to E:
       
    • Travel time route A (normal road):
    • Travel time route B (highway):
       
    • Wardrop principle: Travellers tend to minimize their travel time.

S

E

Route A

Route B

n_{A}
n_{B}
N = n_{A} + n_{B}
t_A(n_A) = 500 + n_A \cdot 2
t_B(n_B) = 1000 + n_B \cdot 1

How many people use each road? What are the travel times?

( IV: Assignment )

S

E

Route A

  • Example: Two routes
    • If travel time on A is shorter than B, people would switch to B, and vice versa. Hence, travel times, must be in equilibirum!

       
    • This gives

       
N = n_{A} + n_{B}
t_A(n_A) = 500 + n_A \cdot 2
t_B(n_B) = 1000 + n_B \cdot 1
t_A(n_A) = t_B(n_B)
500 + 2 \cdot n_A = 1000 + 1 \cdot n_B
n_A = N - n_B

(*)

from (**)

(**)

Route B

( IV: Assignment )

S

E

Route A

  • Example: Two routes
    • If travel time on A is shorter than B, people would switch to B, and vice versa. Hence, travel times, must be in equilibirum!

       
    • This gives

       
N = n_{A} + n_{B}
t_A(n_A) = 500 + n_A \cdot 2
t_B(n_B) = 1000 + n_B \cdot 1
t_A(n_A) = t_B(n_B)
500 + 2 \cdot n_A = 1000 + 1 \cdot n_B
n_A = N - n_B

(*)

from (**)

(**)

Route B

N = 1000

( IV: Assignment )

S

E

Route A

  • Example: Two routes
    • If travel time on A is shorter than B, people would switch to B, and vice versa. Hence, travel times, must be in equilibirum!

       
    • This gives

       
N = n_{A} + n_{B}
t_A(n_A) = 500 + n_A \cdot 2
t_B(n_B) = 1000 + n_B \cdot 1
t_A(n_A) = t_B(n_B)
500 + 2 \cdot n_A = 1000 + 1 \cdot n_B
n_A = N - n_B

(*)

from (**)

(**)

Route B

n_A = 433.33
n_B = 566.66
t_A = t_B = 1366.66

N = 1000

( IV: Assignment )

  • What about many different routes between two points?
     
  • What about many different start/end points in a network?
     
  • Wardrop defined general formulation, leading to a game-theoretic Nash equilibrium
\text{min}_x \sum_a \int_0^{x_a} t_a(x_a) \text{d}x
\sum_k f_k^{rs} = q_{rs} \ \ \ \forall r, s
x_a = \sum_r \sum_s \sum_k \delta^{rs}_{k,a} f_k^{rs} \ \ \ \forall a
f_k^{rs} \geq 0
x_a \geq 0
s.t.

How to disaggregate the demand?

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

0:00 - 8:00

08:30 - 17:00

17:30 - 0:00

0:00 - 9:00

10:00 - 17:30

17:45 - 21:00

22:00 - 0:00

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Person ID    

Age

Gender

Home (X,Y)

1

43

male

(65345, ...)

2

24

female

(65345, ...)

3

9

female

(65345, ...)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Person ID    

Activity

Start

End

Loc.

523

home

08:00

(x,y)

523

work

08:55

18:12

(x,y)

523

shop

19:10

19:25

(x,y)

523

home

19:40

(x,y)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

OpenStreetMap

GTFS (SYTRAL / SNCF)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Household travel survey (EDGT)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

OpenStreetMap

GTFS (SYTRAL / SNCF)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

National HTS (ENTD)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

OpenStreetMap

GTFS (SYTRAL / SNCF)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

EDGT

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

OpenStreetMap

GTFS (SYTRAL / SNCF)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

Open
Data

Open
Software

+

=

Reproducible research

Integrated testing

National HTS (ENTD)

EDGT

Population census (RP)

Income data (FiLoSoFi)

Commuting data (RP-MOB)

Enterprise census (SIRENE)

OpenStreetMap

GTFS (SYTRAL / SNCF)

Address database (BD-TOPO)

Synthetic travel demand

Open
Data

Open
Software

+

=

Reproducible research

Integrated testing

National HTS (ENTD)

EDGT

Current use cases

Nantes

  • Noise modeling

Current use cases

Lille

  • Park & ride applications
  • Road pricing

Current use cases

Toulouse

  • Placement and use of shared offices

Current use cases

Rennes

  • Micromobility simulation

Current use cases

Paris / Île-de-France

  • Scenario development for sustainable urban transformation
     
  • New mobility services

    Mahdi Zargayouna (GRETTIA / Univ. Gustave Eiffel)
    Nicolas Coulombel (LVMT / ENPC)

Current use cases

Paris / Île-de-France

  • Cycling simulation

Current use cases

Paris / Île-de-France

  • Simulation of dynamic mobility services
     
  • Fleet control through reinforcement learning

Current use cases

Lyon (IRT SystemX)

  • Low-emission first/last mile logistics

Current use cases

Current use cases

Balac, M., Hörl, S. (2021) Synthetic population for the state of California based on open-data: examples of San Francisco Bay area and San Diego County, presented at 100th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

Sallard, A., Balac, M., Hörl, S. (2021) Synthetic travel demand for the Greater São Paulo Metropolitan Region, based on open data, Under Review

Sao Paulo, San Francisco Bay area, Los Angeles five-county area, Switzerland, Montreal, Quebec City, Jakarta, Casablanca, ...

Emissions in Paris

Grand Paris Express

Automated taxis in Paris

Automated taxis in Paris

IV. Logistics

Photo by Tom Fisk from Pexels

LEAD Project

Low-emission Adaptive last-mile logistics supporting on-demand economy through Digital Twins

  • H2020 Project from 2020 to 2023
     
  • Six living labs with different innovative logistics concepts
    • Lyon, The Hague, Madrid, Budapest, Porto, Oslo
    • One partner for implementation and one for research each
       
  • Development of a generic modeling library for last-mile logistics scenario simulation and analysis

Lyon Living Lab

  • Peninsula Confluence between Saône and Rhône
     
  • Interesting use case as there are limited access points
     
  • Implementation of an urban consolidation center (UCC) to collect the flow of goods and organize last-mile distribution
    • using cargo-bikes
    • using electric robots
    • and others
       
  • Analysis and modeling through
    • Flow estimation through cameras
    • Simulation of future scenarios
       
  • Focus on parcel deliveries due to data availability

Modeling methodology

Agent-based simulation of Lyon

Demand in parcel deliveries

Distribution by operators

KPI Calculation

  • Main question: What is the impact on traffic and population of implementing an Urban Consolidation Center in Confluence?
     
  • Focus on B2C parcel deliveries due to data availability

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Iterative proportional fitting (IFP)

  • Based on synthetic population, find average number of purchases delivered to a household defined by socioprofesional class, age of the reference person and household size per day.
\mu_{a,h,s} = d_{s} \cdot \frac{w_{a,h,s}}{365}

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Maximum entropy approach

  • We now the average number of parcels, but we do not now the distribution of the number of parcels for a household on an average day.
     
  • We know it must be non-negative, and we know the mean.
     
  • Without additional data, we assume maximum entropy distribution, which is Exponential in this case.
F(N \leq n) = \text{Pois}(\mu)

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Methodology: Parcel demand

Synthetic population

Gardrat, M., 2019. Méthodologie d’enquête: le découplage de l’achat et de la récupération des marchandises par les ménages. LAET, Lyon, France.

+

Synthetic population

Out-of-home purchase survey
Achats découplés des ménages

Based on sociodemographic attributes of the households, parcels are generated for the city on an average day.

Presence of household members

Methodology: Route optimization

Using a heursitic routing solver, an optimal distribution scheme per distribution center is obtained to arrive at a lower bound estimate for the distance covered for the deliveries.

JSprit

First case study

Hörl, S. and J. Puchinger (2021) From synthetic population to parcel demand: Modeling pipeline and case study for last-mile deliveries in Lyon, Working paper.

Solve VRP-TW based on generated parcels and household presence

JSprit

Scaling up: City-wide baseline

Using shares of customer preference, parcels are assigned to operators and the closest distribution centers.

SIRENE: Delivery centers

Scaling up: City-wide baseline

Using shares of customer preference, parcels are assigned to operators and the closest distribution centers.

SIRENE: Delivery centers

Scaling up: City-wide baseline

Using shares of customer preference, parcels are assigned to operators and the closest distribution centers.

SIRENE: Delivery centers

Scaling up: City-wide baseline

Using shares of customer preference, parcels are assigned to operators and the closest distribution centers.

SIRENE: Delivery centers

Methodology: Supply side

Vehicle routing and fleet composition problem

  • Minimize total cost of delivering all parcels for each center
    • Distance cost influenced by fuel / electricity cost
    • Fixed cost (per day) influenced by salaries and vehicle cost
       
  • Derive
    • Distances driven and related emissions
    • Fleet composition for each center

Novel approximation method

Visualisation platform

UCC platform

Questions?

Representation of mobility demand in ABMS

By Sebastian Hörl

Representation of mobility demand in ABMS

ENPC, 22 November 2024

  • 64