Soares Chen
Creator of Quiver.js.
Solving the Haskell record problem with Data.Constraint.Dict and implicit parameters
Soares Chen
Haskell SG Meetup - June 2018
Functions working around an environment / name arguments
Problems with concrete type Env
Hard to extend
Extension affects all code globally
Hard to break down into smaller parts
etc
data Env = Env { foo :: String, ... }
myApp :: Env -> Result
myApp :: Reader Env Result
myApp :: ReaderT Env (IO Result)
myApp :: MonadReader Env m => m Result
Row Polymorphism
Subtyping
Dynamic Typing
Duct Typing
etc
The Has* / ReaderT design patterns
class HasFoo a where
getFoo :: a -> String
class Has a ctx where
get :: ctx -> a
class HasField (x :: Symbol) r a | x r -> a where
getField :: Proxy# x -> r -> a
Manual instance declaration
Limited support on auto instance declarations
Hard to create new types that extends concrete types
Interoperability issues
Libraries have to commit to specific type classes / record framework
Hard to compose functions with complex constraints
Require explicit type annotation
MultiParamTypeClasses causes ambiguity in intermediate type variables
Easily get into typeclass language extensions hell
FlexibleInstances, OverlappingInstances, IncoherentInstances,
AllowAmbiguousTypes, FunctionalDependencies, UndecidableInstances, etc
Limitations on nested constraint resolution
Record contains field with flexible type, satisfying some other constraint
Manipulation of record object turning into other types
Yet Another Solution to the Record Problem
Data.Constraint.Dict
Implicit Parameters
Introducing
data Dict :: Constraint -> * where
Dict :: p => Dict p
showStringDict :: Dict (Show String)
showStringDict = Dict
Dynamic scoping
Act like local constraints
Restriction: only one type per named parameter
Problematic when consuming multiple environments with similar parameters
Dictionary stores accessors, not values
handleFooLike :: forall a
. (?getFoo :: a -> String)
=> a -> Result
data Env = Env { foo :: String }
result = let
?getFoo = foo
in
handleFooLike $ Env { foo = "fooValue" }
Can “instantiate” abstract functions by partially applying dictionaries to functions
No runtime overhead
No complicated type class constraint resolution
handleFooLike :: forall a
. Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String)
-> a -> Result
data Env = Env { foo :: String }
envDict :: Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String)
envDict = let ?getFoo = foo in Dict
handleEnv :: Env -> Result
handleEnv = handleFooLike envDict
result = handleEnv $ Env { foo = "fooValue" }
Have to use WithLens data wrapper to work around lack of impredicative polymorphism
Remaining slides focus on getters only for simplicity
data WithLens s a = WithLens { getLens :: Lens' s a }
handleFooLike :: forall a
. Dict (?fooLens :: WithLens a String)
-> a -> Result
data Env = Env { _foo :: String }
makeLenses ''Env
handleEnv :: Env -> Result
handleEnv = let
?fooLens = WithLens foo
in
handleFooLike Dict
result = handleEnv $ Env { _foo = "fooValue" }
For any constraint p q, Dict (p, q), Dict (q, p) and Dict p are different types!
handleFooLike :: forall a
. Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String)
-> a -> Result
data Env = Env { foo :: String, bar :: String }
envDict :: Dict (
?getFoo :: a -> String,
?getBar :: a -> String)
envDict = let
?getFoo = foo
?getBar = bar
in
Dict
-- Type Error!
handleEnv :: Env -> Result
handleEnv = handleFooLike envDict
Dict of set of constraints always entails:
Dict of subset of constraints
Dict of different order of constraints
mapDict = “cast” operator for dictionaries
newtype a :- b = Sub (a => Dict b)
-- example
ordToEq :: forall a. Ord a :- Eq a
ordToEq = Sub Dict
mapDict :: (a :- b) -> Dict a -> Dict b
mapDict (Sub q) Dict = q
handleEnv :: Env -> Result
handleEnv = handleFooLike $ mapDict (Sub Dict) envDict
(someDict <-> Dict) boilerplates
Necessary evil to make dict typing work
Abuse? Ugly hacks?
Opportunity for GHC extension?
infixr 7 <->
(<->) :: forall p q. Dict p -> (p => Dict q) -> Dict q
(<->) Dict dict = dict
handleEnv :: Env -> Result
handleEnv = handleFooLike $ envDict <-> Dict
-- More verbose alternative
handleEnv = case envDict of Dict -> handleFooLike Dict
composeHandler :: forall p q a r
. Monoid r
=> (Dict p -> a -> r) -> (Dict q -> a -> r)
-> Dict (p, q) -> a -> r
composeHandler f g dict =
let
f' = f (dict <-> Dict)
g' = g (dict <-> Dict)
in
\x -> (f' x) <> (g' x)
handleFooLike :: forall a. Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String) -> a -> String
handleBarLike :: forall a. Dict (?getBar :: a -> String) -> a -> String
-- handleFooBarLike :: forall a
-- . Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String, ?getBar :: a -> String)
-- -> a -> String
handleFooBarLike = composeHandler handleFooLike handleBarLike
infixr 8 &-&
(&-&) :: forall p q. Dict p -> Dict q -> Dict (p, q)
(&-&) Dict Dict = Dict
defaultDict :: forall a. Dict (
?getFoo :: a -> String, ?getBar :: a -> String)
defaultDict = let
?getFoo = \_ -> "default-foo"
?getBar = \_ -> "default-bar"
in Dict
data Env = Env { foo :: String }
envDict1 :: Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String)
envDict1 = let ?getFoo = foo in Dict
envDict2 :: Dict (
?getFoo :: Env -> String,
?getBar :: Env -> String)
envDict2 = fooBarDict &-& (defaultDict @Env) <-> Dict
handleFooBarLike :: forall a
. Dict (?getFoo :: a -> String, ?getBar :: a -> String)
-> a -> Result
-- handleFooBarLike sees: foo = "foo-value", bar = "default-bar"
-- ... or maybe not. (GHC Bug?)
result = handleFooBarLike envDict2 $ Env { foo = "foo-value" }
dict1 :: Dict (?a :: String, ?b :: String, ?c :: String)
dict1 = let ?a = "a1"; ?b = "b1"; ?c = "c1" in Dict
dict2 :: Dict (?c :: String, ?b :: String, ?a :: String)
dict2 = let ?a = "a2"; ?b = "b2"; ?c = "c2" in Dict
dict3 = dict1 &-& dict2
showDict :: Dict (?a :: String, ?b :: String, ?c :: String) -> String
showDict Dict = ?a ++ " " ++ ?b ++ " " ++ ?c
-- castResult1 = "a1 b1 c1"
castResult1 = showDict $ ((dict3 <-> Dict)
:: Dict (?a :: String, ?b :: String, ?c :: String)) <-> Dict
-- castResult2 = "a2 b2 c2"
castResult2 = showDict $ ((dict3 <-> Dict)
:: Dict (?c :: String, ?b :: String, ?a :: String)) <-> Dict
-- castResult3 = "a1 b1 c1"
castResult3 = showDict $ ((dict3 <-> Dict)
:: Dict (?c :: String, ?a :: String, ?b :: String)) <-> Dict
-- castResult4 = "a1 b1 c1"
castResult4 = showDict $ ((dict3 <-> Dict)
:: Dict (?b :: String, ?a :: String, ?c :: String)) <-> Dict
showParam2 :: (?c :: String, ?b :: String, ?a :: String) => String
showParam2 = ?a ++ " " ++ ?b ++ " " ++ ?c
-- castResult5 = "a1 b1 c1"
castResult5 = case dict3 of
Dict -> showParam2
dict4 :: ((?a :: String, ?b :: String, ?c :: String),
(?c :: String, ?b :: String, ?a :: String))
=> Dict (?c :: String, ?b :: String, ?a :: String)
dict4 = Dict
-- castResult6 = "a2 b2 c2"
castResult6 = showDict $ (dict3 <-> dict4) <-> Dict
data Prototype (p :: Constraint) e a where
Prototype :: ((a -> e) -> Dict p) -> Prototype p e a
infixr 8 =&=
(=&=) :: forall p1 p2 e1 e2 a.
Prototype p1 e1 a
-> Prototype p2 e2 a
-> Prototype (p1, p2) (e1, e2) a
(=&=) (Prototype makeDict1) (Prototype makeDict2) =
Prototype $ \getElement ->
(makeDict1 (fst . getElement)) &-&
(makeDict2 (snd . getElement))
runProto :: forall p e. Prototype p e e -> Dict p
runProto (Prototype makeDict) = makeDict id
fooProto :: forall a. Prototype (?getFoo :: a -> String) Env a
fooProto = Prototype $ \getEnv ->
let ?getFoo = foo . getEnv in Dict
barProto :: forall a. Prototype (?getBar :: a -> String) String a
barProto = Prototype $ \getBar ->
let ?getBar = getBar in Dict
fooBarDict :: Dict (
?getFoo :: (String, Env) -> String,
?getBar :: (String, Env) -> String)
fooBarDict = runProto $ barProto =&= fooProto
protoResult = handleFooBarLike fooBarDict
("injected-bar", Env { foo = "foo" })
Abuse? Ugly hacks? Code Smells?
Casting / Subtyping / Dynamic typing / Implicit parameters are bad
Breaks constraints of all type class have only one instance
Better alternatives exist
Constraints are enough, no need Dict
Ways to workaround typeclass restrictions
Extensible effects FTW!
Workaround for lack of advanced type features in Haskell
Quantified Constraints (now available)
Existential types
Impredicative polymorphism
Using Dicts are not much different from using constraints
We already rely on Haskell’s implicit constraint merging / propagation all the time
Efficient and predictable performance
No type level linked lists
Easy to reason
Interoperable with third party libraries
Polymorphic record by convention
Decouples choice of interface vs implementation
No need to commit to specific record library
Flexible higher order dictionary generation
No need to mess with type class extensions
Dict Typing
Implicit parameters of kind Constraint
Constraint Tuple (,)
Dict (?getFoo :: String, p)
Dict Typing
Functions taking dictionaries
Dict type
Explicit dict casting
Implicit parameters in dict
Row Polymorphism
Row variables of kind #Type
class Union l r (u :: # Type)
Row (foo :: String | r)
ML Modules
ML functors
Signatures
Implicit signature matching
Structures
vs
vs
By Soares Chen
Solving the Haskell record problem with Data.Constraint.Dict and implicit parameters