Social Determinants of Health

BE 608

Final Presentations!

Looking forward to seeing what you come up with!

Final Exam

Our final exam is scheduled for December 14 at 6:30pm.

  • On Canvas
  • Download exam and re-upload it
  • 2 hours
  • I'll be monitoring email so if you have any technical issues send me an email.
  • Open notes/slides/etc

State Question

Any big mergers in your state? What does the hospital market look like? Any regulatory activity to prevent mergers or acquisitions?

 

Health Expectancy Over Time

  • Life expectancy 1900: 47.3 years
  • Life expectancy 2004: 77.8 years
  • Value of life expectancy increase from 1970 to 2000: $95 trillion -- 3x the amount spent on medical care. 

Why did life expectancy improve?

About half of the mortality gain from 1900 to 1940 due to water chlorination and filtration (Cutler and Miller 2005).

A large percent (10-15%, depending on source) due to improved nutrition.

Gains in later years partly attributable to decreased smoking rates and improved seatbelts/car safety

All are factors unrelated to "medical care" (as traditionally conceived)

Income and Health

There is a strong relationship between income and health

  • Emerges early in life (e.g., Case, Lubotsky and Paxson 2002 AER).
  • Present in every country for which we have data, every time period for which data exists.
  • True for many measures of health (longevity, obesity, chronic illness).

Income and Health

Income and Health

Chetty et al 2016 JAMA: Descriptive paper

  • Uses massive data from tax records to describe income/health relationship in US.
  • How has health/income relationship changed over time?
  • What is correlated with health of the lowest income individuals?

Income and Health

Data on earned income:

  • Tax returns for filers
  • Sum of W-2 and 1099-G (unemployment) for non-filers
  • Excludes social security benefits and disability benefits

 

Data on death:

  • Social security death master index
  • Look at individuals age 40 to 76

Income and Health

Methods

  • Main outcome: life expectancy for each income percentile--"expected length of life for a hypothetical individual who experiences mortality rates at each subsequent age that match those in the cross-section during a given year" 
  • Conducted separately for men and women
  • Used pre-retirement income percentiles to calculate earnings. I.e., for those over age 63, use their income when they were 61 to define their percentile. 
  • Adjust for racial and ethnic composition -- what would effects be if each income percentile had same racial/ethnic composition

Income and Health

Income and Health

Life expectancy improvements are largest at the top, implying greater inequality over time:

  •  life expectancy increased by over 2 years for men/women in the top 5% but (much) less than 1 year for men/women in bottom 5%.

Income and Health

Text

Some places particularly bad for low income individuals -- what is correlated with low life expectancy among low income?

Determinants of Health

The strongest correlates of health expectancy are, for the most part, things that do not involve accessing and using medical care.

Strongest correlates:

  • Health behaviors
  • Demographic composition (education, immigrant presence, homeownership rates, etc).

 

Not correlated:

  • Insurance coverage
  • Amount of preventive care used on average
  • Medical spending

 

Determinants of Health

Chetty et al 2016 shows that over time, high earners and low earners are experiencing health outcomes that are increasingly unequal.

 

Large gains for health for wealthy, stagnation or even worsening health for poor.

A Tale of Two Experiments

Oregon Health Insurance Experiment:

  • Directly targeted health care access
  • Significantly increased use of health services
  • No improvements or inconclusive effects in physical health (some mental health)

Moving to Opportunity:

  • Demonstration for residents of government housing projects.
  • Randomly selected families to be given voucher to move to low poverty neighborhoods.
  • No direct health component.
  • Biggest effects: improvement in health (lower obesity rates, lower blood glucose, fewer hospitalizations)

A Tale of Two Experiments

Ludwig et al New England Journal of Medicine 2011

Baicker et al NEJM 2013

Non-Medical Care Determinants of Health

Factors affecting health not directly related to medical care:

Education

Nutrition

Racism

Substance abuse

Housing stability

Environmental quality

Behaviors

Racism and Racial Disparities in Health Care Received

Much higher mortality rates for non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic white or Hispanic (although some convergence in recent years)

Racism and Racial Disparities in Health Care Received

Long history of horrific treatment of Black patients by the medical community in the United States. One example: Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis in black men (1932)

  • Study of black men, where researchers wanted to study the "natural progression" of syphilis
  • Deliberately withheld treatment from subjects
  • Only ended in 1972 when Associate Press wrote a story about it and there was widespread public outcry

Racism and Racial Disparities in Health Care Received

Racism and Racial Disparities

These are not issues that remain "in the past":

  • Hospital care: Black patient assigned to Black physicians receive more interventions, have lower in hospital morality than when randomly assigned to white physicians (no change for white patients assigned to either Black or white doctors) (Greenwood et al. 2018).
  • Primary care: Black male patients randomly assigned to Black physicians are more likely to get all recommended primary care, "Our findings suggest black doctors could reduce the black-white male gap in cardiovascular mortality by 19 percent." (Alsan, Garrick, Graziani, 2019 American Economic Review)

Structural factors (e.g. historical disinvestment, segregation) may underlie these health gaps, but the evidence suggests increasing representation as a way to reduce these disparities.

Growing rates of substance abuse, suicide

Case and Deaton PNAS 2015: document rising mortality rates among those with low levels of education.

  • Driven by a combination of suicides and drug overdose.

Determinants of Health

More common than deaths from car accidents.

Source: CDC

Opioid Crisis

  •  70,630 drug deaths in 2019, with opioids topping all other drugs.
    • More deaths than American soldiers in the Vietnam and Iraq wars combined
    • More deaths than car crashes
    • More deaths than gun violence
    • More deaths than AIDS at the height of the epidemic.

Far worse drug overdose deaths during COVID--93,331 in 2020 and 80,816 in 2021

Opioid Crisis

Vox Media, based on data from the UN International Narcotics Control Board

Drivers of the opioid epidemic

  • Misleading marketing from Purdue Pharmacy ($8.3bill settlement).
  • "Pay for performance" measures for physicians that included pain management as a performance metric.
  • Reformulation of OxyContin led to the growth of heroin abuse (Evans and Lieber 2018 Review of Economics and Statistics).
    • About 75% of heroin users started with prescription painkillers (Cicero et al. 2016 JAMA Psychiatry).
  • Rise of cheaper to make (and deadlier) fentanyl.

Other proposed drivers:

  • Decreased opportunity for low-education workers due to skill-biased technological change and increased competition from labor intensive markets like China

Camden Coalition and Hotspotting

Healthcare hotspotting

  is the strategic use of data to reallocate resources to a small subset of high-needs, high-cost patients.

  • Super-utilizers, small number of patients with complex, hard-to-manage needs and chronic conditions, can generate a lot of costs.

Are Companies Buying It?

Source: United HC presentation

Are Companies Buying It?

United HealthCare covers 6.4 million Medicaid beneficiaries.

A small percentage of them account for a large amount in spending.

 

(Quote from Forbes, 2018):

"A homeless man in Phoenix named T.J. made 254 trips to the emergency room, had 32 hospital admissions and cost UnitedHealth Group, the nation’s largest health insurance company, and the U.S. healthcare system more than $294,000 since 2015."

  • Moved to temporary housing
  • Helped apply for disability
  • Counseling for depression

Are Companies Buying It?

“Social determinants of health, like food security or stable housing issues, sit upstream from and weigh heavily on gaps in care,” UnitedHealthcare CEO Steve Nelson told analysts on the company’s first quarter earnings call. “Data from other countries and our own experience indicate social investments reduce health care costs, and addressing these social determinants is the next frontier in serving the whole person here in the U.S. "

  • Anthem and UnitedHC both making substantial investments (over $350 mil) in affordable housing for their Medicaid populations.

Is the Best Health Care Dollar not Spent on Health Care?

Is the Best Health Care Dollar not Spent on Health Care?

Source: ABC News. Ohio Health family practice partnering with local food banks to provide nutrition support. Costs ~$7 per person.

The $1.5 trillion question: does it work?

Everyone wants to reduce cost and improve outcomes.

Is the path forward through targeting healthy behavior, the environmental setting, access to housing, nutritional assistance or cash assistance (or something else)?

 

Companies are eager for an answer to this question!

The $1.5 trillion question: does it work?

Randomized controlled study of the Camden Coalition "hotspotter" program:

  • We randomly assigned 800 hospitalized patients with medically and socially complex conditions, all with at least one additional hospitalization in the preceding 6 months, to the Coalition’s care-transition program or to usual care. The primary outcome was hospital readmission within 180 days after discharge.
  • The 180-day readmission rate was 62.3% in the intervention group and 61.7% in the control group. The adjusted between-group difference was not significant (0.82 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −5.97 to 7.61).

Finkelstein, Zhou, Taubman and Doyle

New England Journal of Medicine 2019

The $1.5 trillion question: does it work?

One attempted solution for firms: the "Workplace Wellness" program.

Offer incentives to lose weight, quit smoking, visit the gym more etc.

Currently 50 million employees have access to these types of programs, and firms with these programs spend on average $742 per employee, according to a recent United HC survey. An $8 billion industry!

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Jones, Molitor and Reif 2019 randomly assigned eligibility for a workplace wellness program, and the size of financial incentives, at the University of Illinois.

 

Wellness program offered employees an incentive of $75 per semester if they engaged in at least one "wellness activity" that met once a week for 6 to 12 weeks, plus $200 for signing up and taking a health risk assessment.

E.g., weight watchers, stress management class, smoking cessation program

 

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors find that previous literature looking at differences across wellness plan participants and non-participants was driven by selection, i.e. those who choose to participate in a wellness program tend to be healthier anyway.

  • If workplace wellness programs save employers money, it is only because it is a "perk" that helps retain healthy employees and not sick employees.

Workplace Wellness Randomized Controlled Trial

Who signed up (red) versus who didn't (blue)

Still a lot to learn

Other ongoing randomized controlled trials:

Nutritional Supports for At-Risk Patients

Smoking Cessation Commitment Devices

Y Combinator Universal Basic Income

 

And other projects--more evidence will be here soon!

Course evaluations!

You should have gotten an email to access your course evaluations.

Your feedback is important to me!

Please take this extra time to complete the course evaluations. 

https://umich.bluera.com/umich/

(Bonus slides)

Nutritional Inequality

Allcott et al. 2019 Quarterly Journal of Economics based on Neilsen Scanner Panel

Nutritional Inequality

Allcott et al. 2019 QJE

Nutritional Inequality

Why? Differential availability: explains only about 10%

But lowering the prices on healthy food could eliminate disparities (at a cost of about 15% of the FNS budget)

Nutritional Inequality

Copy of Lecture 5

By umich

Copy of Lecture 5

  • 219