Presenter vs. Facilitator

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

We are used to this way of learning.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

1.GROUP DYAMIC WITH A PRESENTER:

Which can be simplified like this.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

In interactive peer designs we can provide an impulse...

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

In interactive peer designs we can provide an impulse...

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

In interactive peer designs we can provide an impulse...

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

Interactive Peer Design

Nurturing Infrastructure

Skill Building Support

Engagement Process

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

Webinar Structure

Participants  -  Presenters  -  Q&A

Interactive Peer Design

100

2

5

100

2

5

Webinar Structure

Participants

Interactive Peer Design

100

2

5

100

2

5

Presenters

Q&A

Webinar Structure

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

Interactive Peer Design

100

2

5

0

100

2

5

25

Participants Co-facilitating

0

100

Participants Interacting

Webinar Structure

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

Interactive Peer Design

0

25

Participants Co-facilitating

0

100

Participants Interacting

Content Delivery

Motivation

Online Fatigue

Content Retention

Sense of Isolation

Sense of Community

Potential Impacts:

CfC Community Building Initiative

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

Aims:

  • Relationships: to nurture Deep Connections

  • Purpose: to strengthen Community Engagement

 

Roadmap:

  • Project: to serve Compassionate Cities USA

  • Events: to practice dialogue within podcast communities

  • Skill Sets: to develop community building skills

 

Volunteering:

  • Organising: to support initiating community events

  • Facilitation: to get trained to lead workshop groups

 

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

2.GROUP DYNAMICS WITH FACILITATOR

...yet the learning experience itself is between peers.

PRESENTER VS FACILITATOR

By crossingborderseducation

PRESENTER VS FACILITATOR

  • 154