Potentials (and Pitfalls)

of Online Student and Instructor Collaboration

Approaching instruction like a hacker

~ Jon Pickens

 

Please go to:

http://bit.ly/potential-OC

...the real issue we face today is not whether this new technology can provide us with the means of life in a toil-less society,

 

but whether it can help to humanise society,

 

whether it can contribute to the creation of entirely new relationships between man and man

Towards a liberatory technology (1965) Bookchin

A Hacker's Pedagogy

Hacker Ethic* (in short)

  1. Access to anything which might teach you about the way the world works should be unlimited and total
  2. All information should be free.
  3. Mistrust authority—promote decentralization.
  4. Hackers should be judged by their hacking, not degrees, race etc.
  5. You can create art and beauty on a computer.
  6. Computers can change your life for the better.

 

  1. Accessibility of teaching materials and tools should be  unlimited and total
  2. All information should be free.
  3. Mistrust your own authority—promote student direction
  4. Students should be free from the fear of persecution
  5. You can create art and beauty in education
  6. Education can change our lives for the better.

The Allure of Online Collaboration

Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Mit Press.

The Emergency Management Information Systems And Reference Index (EMISARI)

  • Time and location independant collaborative actions
  • "real-time voting, data collection assignment and reporting, and discussion"

Your Perspective

http://bit.ly/PD-Pad

How & why do you want to incorporate online collaboration?

5. You can create art and beauty in education

Cryptpad can even make similar presentations to Slides.com

The Allure of Online Collaboration

  • Convenience
  • Save time for class
  • Collaborative Learning (Vygotsky)
  • Student directed community of learners (Green)
  • Low-stakes (Elbow)
  • Making the course relevant to students' lives
  • Counter-hegemonic? (Warf & Grimes, 1997)

(for me)

Warf, B., & Grimes, J. (1997). Counterhegemonic discourses and the Internet. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259–274.

  • Accessibility issues
  • Extra work
  • Student confusion
  • Going off the rails or causing harm
  • Social stakes
  • Making the course burdensome on students' lives
  • Forcing conformity
  • So...many...choices...😫

Affordances

Costs

Start with assignments, then tools

Stakes

Sociality

PSYCH 150 Hunter

Social Papers (Beta)

Some questions to consider

1. Accessibility of teaching materials and tools should be  unlimited and total

3. Mistrust your own authority—promote student direction

4. Students should be free from the fear of persecution

Is this mobile friendly?

Is it easy/intuitive?

Visual/Auditory impairment friendly?

Level of micromanaging?

Variety of expression?

Is it fun?

How public is participation?

How well do these tools treat us?

What is the potential of harassment?

Yup!

Yes

Mostly

Low

Yes

I think so

Optional

Mostly well

Low

Some questions to consider

1. Accessibility of teaching materials and tools should be  unlimited and total

3. Mistrust your own authority—promote student direction

4. Students should be free from the fear of persecution

Is this mobile friendly?

Is it easy/intuitive?

Visual/Auditory impairment friendly?

Level of micromanaging?

Variety of expression?

Is it fun?

How public is participation?

How well do these tools treat us?

What is the potential of harassment?

Yup!

With some help

Yes

Moderate

Yes

Can be

Optional

Well!

Low

Some questions to consider

1. Accessibility of teaching materials and tools should be  unlimited and total

3. Mistrust your own authority—promote student direction

4. Students should be free from the fear of persecution

Is this mobile friendly?

Is it easy/intuitive?

Visual/Auditory impairment friendly?

Level of micromanaging?

Variety of expression?

Is it fun?

How public is participation?

How well do these tools treat us?

What is the potential of harassment?

Barely

No

Yes

Moderate

Yes

:-/

Optional

Poorly

Low

4. Students should be free from the fear of persecution

  • Feeling secure online is a privilege
  • Only as safe as the most vulnerable (herd immunity)
  • Instructor choices create or mitigate vulnerabilities
  • Securities may become vulnerabilities (data breach)

Undocumented students and ICE

Example:

ICE arrests in NYC +39% in 2017 (Pew, 2018)

Online collaboration and ...ICE?

Example:

ICE builds profiles by surveilling social media

ICE has active contracts with major tech companies to aid in surveillance

Anyone with a database may be pressed-- including NYPD

Holistic approach

Holistic choices

  • Balance, not purity
  • Informed consent
  • Accommodations

Threat Modeling Online Collaboration

A Simple Actor Map            

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

Student

YOU

Department

CUNY

Tech Company A

NYS Gov

Fed Gov

College

Internet providers

Other Instructors

Every other individual on the planet

Sorta

5. Education can change our lives for the better.

What tools does my institution support?

How much time/effort am I willing to invest?

Can I work on this with other instructors?

What is the simplest implementation?

goo.gl/zNTXUk

Potential (and Pitfalls) of Online Student-Instructor Collaboration

By cypurr

Potential (and Pitfalls) of Online Student-Instructor Collaboration

  • 177