About Me

A Nerd Who Loves Solving Problems

Agenda

Common pitfalls & how to avoid them
Instability & Interpretation
- A Principal Components Example
- A Kalman Filter Example
More than one way to scramble an egg
- Features and interpretation over model selection
A Focus on Implementation & Implied Assumptions

Common Pitfalls

The devil is in the details

*Courtesy of Caitlin Hudon https://twitter.com/beeonaposy

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

No magic formula, but there are some good guidelines

Reproducing sub-results in different environments (Excel & R/MatLab)
Interpret, decompose, interpret
No replacement for time, experience, & care
- You will be rushed -- It is okay to delay
Review your assumptions, then do it again
- Are there implicit assumptions?
Can you realistically implement?
- Was all data available? revised? realistic lag time?

Instability & Interpretation

Stability & Interpretation normally go hand in hand

As humans, we are natural story-tellers
- It is far too easy to append a narrative to data or output
- But if that output is unstable, how can our narrative be true?
Ensuring our analysis is stable and consistent is one of the most important excercises we can carry out
Let's look at two examples:
- Principal Component Analysis
- Kalman Filter & Neural Nets

PCA Intro 1

Principal Component Analysis -- A Quick Primer

In contrast to Linear Regression which finds the best β to fit , PCA find the best combination of r so that and
- Like Linear Regression where betas are 1, moves the data instead
What are the principal components?
1. The first principal component is the combination of data that explain the most variance and
2. Every following component is the same, but also with the covariance between it and the previous component equal to zero

\bold y = \pmb\beta*\bold r

\bold y = \pmb\beta*\bold r

\bold y = \pmb\beta*\bold r

\bold y = \pmb\beta*\bold r

\pmb\beta'*\pmb\beta = 1

\pmb\beta'*\pmb\beta = 1

\pmb\beta'*\pmb\beta = 1

\pmb\beta'*\pmb\beta = 1

PCA Intro 2

Principal Component Analysis -- What Is It Good For?

Dimension Reduction & Clustering

In practice
- Check autocorrelation of returns
- Rotation usually is helpful
- Can be used/compared with Factor Models to gain intuition

Explain All This

With Just This

PCA Problems

PCA-- Notoriously Unstable, What Does It Mean?

Kalman Filter Intro 1

Kalman Filter -- A Quick Primer

The Kalman Filter is a model with many names
- First consider Time-Series Model, the Vector Auto-Regression

The prediction for is a state, which helps prediction

The state is sometimes considered a hidden regime or layer

x_{t} = \phi_{t-1} + w_{t}

x_{t} = \phi_{t-1} + w_{t}

x

x

y_{t} = \Alpha_{t}x_t + v_{t}

y_{t} = \Alpha_{t}x_t + v_{t}

Kalman Filter Intro 2

The importance of the transition matrix

When using the Kalman Filter for time-varying models and states, the transition matrix helps stability of the state
- First consider two states

\begin{matrix} S_{1,t} \\ S_{2,t} \end{matrix} = \pmb\phi_{t-1} + \bold w_{t}

\begin{matrix} S_{1,t} \\ S_{2,t} \end{matrix} = \pmb\phi_{t-1} + \bold w_{t}

95%	5%
10%	90%

\begin{matrix} S_{1} \\ S_{2} \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} S_{1} \\ S_{2} \end{matrix}

S_{1}

S_{1}

S_{2}

S_{2}

From

State

To

State

Kalman Filter Regimes

Kalman Filter -- These States Can Describe Regimes

Unstable

More Complexity Adds Difficulty

Adding more states only makes it less stable

Using Theory With Regimes

Instead of allowing the model to drive theory we should guide it

Comparison With Neural Nets

A simple visual comparison

Hidden Markov Model

Inputs

Hidden States Selected on Probability of Fit According to Features

States Effect Output

Neural Net

Select Features That Describe Hidden Layer

Hidden Layers Chosen

Hidden Layers Effect Output

Comparison Of Output

This example comparison highlights importance of transition matrix

Implementation

Let's take a step back and discuss implementation

One of the most famous models in finance is the Shiller PE 10

*Data from EDS & Robert Shiller's website

A Simple Implementation

Implementation of this signal, on its face, should be easy

*Data from EDS & Robert Shiller's website

Quick Test

However, implementing a quick test, we don't see gains?

This test implies free trading costs

*Data from EDS, Shiller & Bloomberg, courtesy of London Business School

So What Went Wrong Part 1

Implied Assumptions -- If You Sell Equities, What Do You Buy?

Bonds share the same relationship with the measure

Interesting Side Note, These Are Driven By Inlfationary Periods

*Data from EDS, Shiller & Bloomberg, courtesy of London Business School

So What Went Wrong Part 2

Didn't Check Assumptions

Strong autocorrelation, breaks an underlying assumption of OLS
Interpretation: A new portfolio created each month?

*Data from EDS & Shiller

More Than One Way To Scramble An Egg

Focus on Features, Intuition, & Implementation

Different Models Same Insight

Both MVO & OLS Lead to the Same Output

Let's go through the spreadsheet here

Unfortunately, due to data restrictions I am unable to make this spreadsheet public. Please contact me for more details.

*Data from EDS & Bloomberg, courtesy of London Business School

From Slack L1 L2

Generalized Additive Models - Mixing Elastic Net with Cross-Validation

Similar to the Slack variable we have a clear intuition
- L1-Norm: Make sure outliers don't drive model
- L2-Norm: Which factors should we choose?

\small \boldsymbol L(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\beta) = \underbrace{\text{\textbar} y - X\beta \text{\textbar}^2}_{OLS} + \underbrace{\lambda_2\text{\textbar} \beta \text{\textbar}^2}_{L2-Norm} + \underbrace{\lambda_1 \text{\textbar} \beta \text{\textbar}_1}_{L1-Norm}

\small \boldsymbol L(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\beta) = \underbrace{\text{\textbar} y - X\beta \text{\textbar}^2}_{OLS} + \underbrace{\lambda_2\text{\textbar} \beta \text{\textbar}^2}_{L2-Norm} + \underbrace{\lambda_1 \text{\textbar} \beta \text{\textbar}_1}_{L1-Norm}

Using Cross-Validation

Cross-Validation is used to choose parameters

The intuition behind this approach is sacrificing the 'best fit' for stability
- A New Goal: The least wrong, the most often

1st Iteration

2nd Iteration

10th Iteration

...

\overbrace{\textcolor{#f9f9f9}{..............................}}^{\text Training Folds}

\overbrace{\textcolor{#f9f9f9}{..............................}}^{\text Training Folds}

\overbrace{\textcolor{#f9f9f9}{}}^{\text Test Fold}

\overbrace{\textcolor{#f9f9f9}{}}^{\text Test Fold}

\rArr E_1

\rArr E_1

\rArr E_2

\rArr E_2

\rArr E_{10}

\rArr E_{10}

\Huge \rbrace \small Avg

\Huge \rbrace \small Avg

Full Training Data

Why Are GAMs Useful?

Rather than focusing on a new model/approach that is harder to interpret, GAMs provide a framework for robust traditional modelling

At the end of the day, GAMs are just a special case of OLS
- But then, so are most models
GAMs are a machine learning framework to automate the model building process
- 'Features are King' -- but which ones to choose?
- These features should be interpretable, robust, and consistent
- Easier to understand the connection between theory and output

Conclusion

Main Takeaways

Pitfalls are easy to fall into and 'insights' can be deceptive

Focus on details & assumptions, interpretation, implementation, and consistency

Avoid pitfalls through reproducibility, patience, and care
Learn your tools and systems, check the details and data types
By focusing on interpretation all other good habits follow
- What does this mean in terms of implementation?
- What are the underlying & implicit assumptions?
- Do I understand and can I explain the output?
- Is it consistent? Am I achieving my goals?

Frameworks Not Models

Progress in Machine Learning & A.I. have enabled many advances

Thinking of these in terms of frameworks will gain more benefits

Building a model is great, but it isn't really a solution
Successful value add will come by combining many tools and insights into a robust framework for decision making
- These tools are about automation & enablement
- Focus more on finding implementable & interpretable insights
Look more broadly, more deeply than before
- This is fundamental
- Leads to more informed decision making

Why Bother With All This? Part 1

More informed decisions, in a more robust process, leads to better results

Better outcomes, one example of many is in Hedge Funds

*Data from EDS & Bloomberg, courtesy of London Business School

Why Bother With All This? Part 2

Using A.I. in financial services is becoming a 'must-have'

Aug 2017: 20% usage of A.I. or Machine Learning
Aug 2018: 56% usage

Blackrock Data Science Core

Exploratory programs on machine learning

A.I. based risk management
Dynamic factor analysis using A.I.
A.I. reconciling investment decisions

March 2018: Launches WealthDesk

Concluding Remarks

More informed decisions, in a more robust process, leads to better results

ML and AI aren't neccessarily a value-add
When combined in a strong framework the value adds are fundamental:
- Enabling you to work with a more holistic perspective
- Increasing efficiency and therefore productivity
- Allows you to focus more on insights & implementation
Know your systems, big problems require an understanding of tools
Interpretation is the realm of the human
- These tools are powerful, but if you can't understand the 'why' then they are little use to anyone

Disclaimers

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this presentation, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), or be suitable for an individual's portfolio.

Our projections are based on current market conditions which can vary over the coming months and weeks. Additionally, our projections are based on historical market behavior which may vary unexpectedly. Using Machine Learning, our tool should adjust to new market fluctuations but we might not be able to avoid short term volatility.

Stanford - Stats & ML in Investment Mgmt

More from Economic Data Sciences