Test Automation misconceptions
Automated Testing is Better than Manual Testing
Automation and Manual are complimentary
Automation | Exploratory |
---|---|
Expected action | Unexpected scenario |
Machines are great for running straightforward tests | Humans are great for tests requiring inteligence and experience |
Gives confidence | Finds new defects |
Achieving 100% Automated Testing
100% is still an unrealistic goal
Quick ROI
ROI is returned in the long run when we need to execute the same tests at regular intervals
Higher Rate of Defect Detection through Automated Checks
test automation solutions
will never be able to compete with the intelligence of a human
people expect automated testing to find lots of bugs because of allegedly increased test coverage
Higher Rate of Defect Detection through Automated Checks
- automated tests are good at catching regression issues
- The scripts are as good as the person who wrote them
- can give a false impression of the quality of the product
- can prove the existence of defects, but it cannot prove their absence
We Only Require Unit Test Automation
not sure
The illusion of using one Automation tool for all projects
No such tool
deck
By Igor Sosnovskyy
deck
- 40