Geometric Algebras
2020 James B. Wilson
Colorado State University

Objectives
- Identify qualities of scientific algebraic systems.
- Composition algebras & Hurwitz's Theorem
- Scaling with Linear Algebra
- Matrix rings & Groups
- Classical Lie & Jordan algebras, & Groups
Essentials of a scientist's number system
- Robust Arithmetic: enough to state meaningful equations ⋅,÷,1,+,−,0
- Algebraically Closed: enough numbers to solve equations even if some solutions later ignored.
-
Geometry: connect measurement to algebra
- Triangle inequality ∣a+b∣≤∣a∣+∣b∣
- Scaling property ∣a⋅b∣=∣a∣⋅∣b∣
- Unbounded Dimensions to capture large systems.
Composition Algebras
Arithmetic+Measurement
Hurwitz' Theorem.
Composition Algebra: A has length & [∗,1,÷,+,−,0]-arithmetic
- +,-,0 are an abelian group,
- multiplication distributes, and
- length (quadratic norm) satisfies ∣αβ∣=∣α∣∣β∣.
Theorem( Hurwitz) There 4 families like this:
- A field
- A quadratic field extension
- Quaternions
- Octonions
Cyclotomic Quadratic Extensions
Let K be a field, think R or Q. Choose α∈K.
- Define (Kα)=K×K with vector addition, 1^:=(1,0) and i=(0,1); and
- Multiplication: ∗a1^bic1^ac1^bcidiadiαbd1^
- a+bi=a−bi "conjugation".
Loose Order: i≤0 and 0≤i
Cyclotomic Quadratic extensions.
- C≅(R−1)≅(R−13)≅R[x]/(x2+1)≅⋯
- R×R≅(R1)≅(R13)≅R[x]/(x2−1)≅⋯
- Q[i]≅(Q−1)≅(Q13)≅Q[13]≅(Q4)≅Q×Q
not always a field, but always quadratic.
Quatnerions
Fix a (Kα) choose β∈K.
- Define (Kα,β)=(Kα)×(Kα) with vector addition, 1^:=(1^,0) and j=(0,1^); and
- Multiplication: ∗a1^bjc1^ac1^bcˉjdjadjβbdˉ1^
- a+bj=aˉ−bˉj "conjugation".
Loose commutative: ij=−ji
i
j
ij
Octonions
Fix a (Kα,β) choose γ∈K.
- Define (Kα,β,γ)=(Kα,β)×(Kα,β) with vector addition, 1^:=(1^,0) and ℓ=(0,1^); and
- Multiplication: ∗a1^bℓc1^ac1^bcˉℓdjdaℓβdˉb1^
- a+bj=aˉ−bˉℓ "conjugation".
Loose Associativity: i(jℓ)=−(ij)ℓ
i
j
ij
ℓ
ℓ
iℓ
jℓ
(ij)ℓ
So 4 essential geometries!
- Orthogonal A field K
- Unitary a quadratic field extension (Kα)=K[α],K×K
- Symplectic a quaternion extension (Kα,β)=H,M2(K)
- Exceptional an octonion extension (Kα,β,γ)=O...
Composition Algebra Summary
- Link geometry to algebra with ∣z∣=zzˉ
- Then there are 4 families
- Fields/Orthogonal
- Quadratic Fields/Unitary
- Quatnions/Symplectic
- Octonions/Exceptional
Matrix rings
Boost the dimensions of composition algebras
Fix a ring K, e.g. Z or Q,R,Q[x],⋯
Mn(K)=⎩⎨⎧A11⋮An1⋯⋯A1n⋮AnnAij∈K⎭⎬⎫
- Addition: [A+B]ij=Aij+Bij
- Minus: [−A]ij=−Aij
- Zero: [0]ij=0
- Product: [A⋅B]ij=∑k=1nAikBkj.
- Generators Eij=eitej
- One: identity matrix In=E11+⋯+Enn
Laws
- Addition by Direct Product: Mn(K)≅∏i=1n∏j=1nK as a [+,−,0]-algebraic structure (abelian group). By variety rules Mn2(K) is abelian group.
-
Multiplication Laws must be proved directly
- distributive,
- associative,
- identity
[A⋅(B+C)]ij=k=1∑nAik(B+C)kj=k=1∑nAik(Bkj+Ckj)=k=1∑n(AikBkj+AikCkj)=k=1∑nAikBkj+k=1∑nAikCkj=[A⋅B]ij+[A⋅C]ij
Congruences/Quotients
- If K has a quotient K/∼ then Mn(K)/∼ exists where A∼B⟺∀i∀j.(Aij∼Bij)
- E.g. Mn(Z) has quotients Mn(Z)/∼≅Mn(Z/n), but what if K has not quotients, e.g. K a field?
- Theorem (Wedderburn). If K is a field or division ring then Mn(K) is simple (has only the two trivial congruences.)
Proof. Suppose there is a square matrix M that is nonzero but M∼0. There are matrices X,Y∈Mn(K) where 0∼X0Y∼XMY=[Ir000]=:E where r is the rank of M (i.e. row and col. reduce this is where we assume inverses of nonzero coefficients). And so in fact 0∼E11⋅E=E11
Chose permutation matrices Σ so that 0∼ΣE11Σ−1=Eii.
Thus 0∼E11+⋯+Enn=In
Finally ∀X.(0∼(X⋅In)=X)
So if ∃M.(M=0)∧(0∼M)⇒∀M.(0∼M).
Remark for the future...
- There is a notion of a one-sided congruence: x≡y⇒rx≡ry
- If you shift to one side x−y≡0 you get a subalgebra I={z∣z≡0}
- I is a left ideal x,y∈Ir∈R,x∈I⇒x+y∈I⇒rx∈I
- You get equivalence classes that have "half" the algebra, it is called a "module".
When do you get Linear Algebra?
- Be careful! There are K where M2(K)≅M3(K). Not common but still exist.
- Be careful! Determinants only defined if K is a commutative.
- Be careful! Minimum polynomial, characteristic polynomial unique if K is a field.
Matrix Ring Summary
- Mn(K) is a ring, addition by theorems, multiplication is a fresh start.
- Homomorphisms/Quotients include Mn(K)→Mn(K/∼)
- [Wedderburn] Mn(K) is simple if K is field or division ring.
- Method of proof think of linear algebra but check because lots of LA falls apart.
Adding geometry?
Respect the dot-product!
Dot product:
u∗v=u1v1+⋯+unvn=[u1,…,un]v1⋮vn=utv
More generally:
u∗v=[u1,…,un]Dv1⋮vn=utDv where Dt=D
Even more generally:
u∗v=[u1,…,un]Dvˉ1⋮vˉn=utDvˉ where Dt=±Dˉ
Why (Au)∗v=±u∗(Av)?
u∗v=utDv so
(Au)∗v=(Au)tDv=ut(AtD)v
u∗(Av)=utD(Av)=ut(DA)v
(Au)∗v=u∗(Av)⟺AtD=DA
(Au)∗v=u∗(Av)⟺AtD=DAˉ
Why (Au)∗v=±u∗(Av)?
Defn. u⊥v if u∗v=0
Lemma. (Au)∗v=u∗(Av) implies Null(A)⊥Im(A)
Proof. Au=0⇒0=(Au)∗v=u∗(Av).
So these matrices turn geometry into algebra!
Lemma. (Au)∗(Av)=u∗v (length does not change "isometry") if, and only if, (Au)∗v=u∗(Aˉtv) and A is invertible. I.e. AAˉt=I
Geometry→ Algebra
- Break into Symmetric & Skew-symmetric
- Symmetric = 21(A+Aˉt)
- Skew-symmetric =21(A−Aˉt)
A=21(A+Aˉt)+21(A−Aˉt)
So no information lost (except when 2=0!)
Classical Jordan Algebras
Matrices with orthogonal geometry
- K is a field (so we get linear algebra),
- Dot-product: u∗v=utv on Kn
Hermitian Jordan algebras
jon(∗)={A∈Mn(K)∣(Au)∗v=u∗(Av)}={A∈Mn(K)∣At=A}
Addition as in matrices, product A∙B=21(AB+BA).
(A∙B)t=(21(AB+BA))t=21((AB)t+(BA)t)=21(BtAt+AtBt)=21(BA+AB)=21(AB+BA)=A∙B.
Why 1/2? (A∙I)=21(AI+IA)=21(2A)=A
Laws?
- A∙B=B∙A
- A∙I=A
- (A∙A)∙(B∙A)=((A∙A)∙B)∙A
Classical Lie Algebras
Matrices with orthogonal geometry
- K is a field (so we get linear algebra),
- Dot-product: u∗v=utv on Kn
Orthogonal Lie algebras
0n(∗)={A∈Mn(K)∣(Au)∗v=−u∗(Av)}={A∈Mn(K)∣At=−A}
Addition as in matrices, product [A,B]=(AB−BA).
[A,B]t=(AB−BA)t=(AB)t−(BA)t=BtAt−AtBt=(−B)(−A)−(−A)(−B)=−(AB−BA)=−[A,B]
Why no 1/2? [A,I]=(AI−IA)=0
Laws?
- "Altenrating" [A,A]=0
- [A,B]=−[B,A]
- "Jacobi" [A,[B,C]]=[[A,B],C]+[B,[A,C]]
Physics trick...
- Suppose At=Aˉ and Bt=Bˉ, which is a form of "symmetric matrices" so ought to be Jordan.
- Sly trick: [A,B]=i(AB−BA)
[A,B]t=(i(AB−BA))t=iˉ((AB)t−(iBA)t)=−i(BˉAˉ−AˉBˉ)=i(AˉBˉ−BˉAˉ)=i(AB−BA)=−i(AB−BA)=−[A,B]
Hence: i sprinkled everywhere in quantum,e.g. Schrodinger
General Hermitian Geometry
- K is a field with a+bi=a−bi, for some i.
- Hermitian dot-product: u∗v=uˉtDv, D=Dˉt
Unitary Lie algebras
Ln(∗)={A∈Mn(K)∣(uAˉt)∗v+u∗(Av)=0}={A∈Mn(K)∣AˉtD=−DA}
Addition as in matrices, product [A,B]=(AB−BA).
Hermitian Jordan algebras
Hn(∗)={A∈Mn(K)∣(uAˉt)∗v=u∗(Av)}={A∈Mn(K)∣AˉtD=DA}
Addition as in matrices, product A∙B=21(AB+BA).
E.g. Symplectic (quaternion) geometry
- K is a field (so we get linear algebra),
- Hermitian dot-product: u∗v=uˉtJv on Kn, J=[0−ImIm0]
Symplectic Jordan algebras
H2m(K)= {A∈M2m(K)∣At=JAJ−1}
Symplectic Lie algebras
sp2m(K)={A∈M2m(K)∣At=−JAJ−1}
Mm(H)≅H2m(K)⊕sp2m(K) where H is Hamilton's quatnerions.
Laws
- Addition, sometimes a direct product, but careful not on the diagonal! I.e. Aii=Aˉii. So in unitary cases needs special purpose study of laws.
- Multiplication laws are far more complicated. A∙B=B∙AA∙In=A [A,A]=0[A,B]=−[B,A](A∙A)∙(B∙A)=(((A∙A)∙B)∙A [[A,B],C]=[B,[A,C]]+[A,[B,C]]
Congruences
These algebras are simple! They are therefore key building blocks of geometry.
If you go into science, get to know these algebras
Important Groups & Loops
Derived form composition algebras
Take invertible elements!
- Field, units are the nonzeros.
- Better yet, take group of length 1:
- U(A)={z∈A∣∣z∣=1}
- z,w∈U(A)⇒∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣=1⇒zw∈U(A)
Boring start U(R)={z∣∣z∣=1}={±1}≅Z/2 but with complex gets interesting....
- U(C)={z∣∣z∣=1}={a+bi∣1=∣a+bi∣=(a+bi)(a−bi)=a2+b2}=S1
- which you know because unit circle is eiθ=cosθ+isinθ.
- I.e. group is eiθeiτ=ei(θ+τ)
Try with quaternions.
- U(H)={z∣∣z∣=1}={a+bi+cj+dk∣1=a2+b2+c2+d2}=S3 which you may know from i,j,k rotation in graphics
- Super important subgroup (right-hand rule group) is Q8={±1,±i,±j,±k} "The Quaternion group"
Try with octonions...
- U(Q)={z∣∣z∣=1}={a+bi+cj+dk+eℓ+f(iℓ)+g(jℓ)+h(kℓ)∣1=a2+b2+c2+d2+e2+f2+g2+h2}=S7 you don't know this one,
- neither to do I;
- Physics pretends to know it.
- It is not even a group (nonassociative), it is what is known as a Moufang Loop.
- If you learn this one you might become a powerful wizzard.
Geometric Algebra
By James Wilson
Geometric Algebra
- 663