The Value of Practical and Theoretical Knowledge
TOK PRESENTATION
by Johara Meyer
Real-life situation:
Can the value of knowledge be measured by the extent to which it has practical applications?
value of knowledge
measured
referring to the significance or importance of knowledge
referring to the ability to evaluate / make generalizations about
practical
applications
referring to using knowledge for real-life rather than theoretical purposes
AOK: Natural Sciences, Art
WOK: Reason, Imagination, Emotion
Knowledge Question:
CLAIM: The extent to which knowledge is practical depends on the knowers perspective.
- What is considered practical by one person may not be considered practical by another
- Applies to both shared and personal knowledge
Example (shared knowledge):
Water is made up of H20 molecules
Example (personal knowledge):
Learning dance choreographies
COUNTER-CLAIM: Knowledge is in itself valuable and therefore still holds value even if it is not considered to be practical by an individual
All knowledge is of itself of some value."
- Samuel Johnson
- Knowledge is valuable in itself
- It can, therefore, never hold no value
- Even if most people see certain knowledge as having no practical application, it is still valuable
- Many universities use Johnson's theory to justify granting funds to research where the likelihood of obtaining "valuable" knowledge is slim.
l
l
CONCLUSION
- making a judgement about the value of knowledge is highly subjective
- the perspective of the individual asked to assess given knowledge will influence how valuable they deem it to be
CLAIM: Practical applications increase the value of knowledge.
- Once we can perceive, imagine or reason how certain knowledge can or is applicable to the real world we value it more.
geometric shapes
organic shapes
X-rays
COUNTER CLAIM: How valuable certain knowledge is depends on the criteria it is judged upon, practicality must not be the only criterion.
- Example: the value of knowledge in an AOK may be evaluated by criteria specific to that AOK
Natural Sciences: Stage in the scientific method determines value
Arts: how appropriate cinematic technique is determines value
CONCLUSION
- knowledge may be considered more valuable if it can be applied practically
- however, knowledge may just as well be evaluated using other criteria
Example:
- Before 1831, scientists had done little to harness electricity for practical usage
- 1831, Michael Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction ( how to generate electricity )
- Now, electricity is used in the real world every day.
CLAIM: The extent to which knowledge is practical changes with time, thus the value of knowledge changes with time.
Electric power consumption (kWh per capita per year)
COUNTER-CLAIM: Knowledge that currently has no practical application could find practical application in the future, thus the value of knowledge should not be measured with regard to practicality.
While knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create.
- Albert Einstein
- We cannot know how practical certain knowledge will be to us at a different point in time
- Dismissing knowledge which currently has no real-world applications as useless may prevent us from "unleashing it's potential"
While knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create.
- Albert Einstein
CONCLUSION
- how practical certain knowledge is to us may change with time
- all knowledge hold "potential" value
- arguably, more value lies in knowledge where this "potential" has not been explored
CONCLUSION
Can the value of knowledge be measured by the extent to which it has application?
- There is a correlation. Applying our knowledge can add great value to our lives.
- However, measuring this value universally is not possible
- It can even be argued, that the value of knowledge lies in its potential to be useful rather than to what extent we exploit that potential at a particular point in time
- In that sense, There's nothing as practical as good theory
SOURCES
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC?end=2014&start=1971
http://visualartspdsf.blogspot.de/2012/02/organic-and-geometric-shapes.html
https://fineartamerica.com/art/geometric+shapes
https://www.graduate.study.cam.ac.uk/courses/directory/mapmaspmm
https://pbsa.hs-duesseldorf.de/studium/studiengaenge/ba_aad
https://de.scribd.com/document/323830771/knowledge-framework-arts-guide#fullscreen&from_embed
http://www.h2owatersolutions.co.uk/about.html
http://www.storyboardthat.com/articles/e/scientific-method
https://www.archdaily.com/438400/free-university-of-berlin-foster-partners/525d6519e8e44eff02000a7e-free-university-of-berlin-foster-partners-details
https://www.ed.ac.uk/studying/postgraduate/degrees/index.php?r=site/view&id=193
https://www.topuniversities.com/courses/art/grad/guide
http://www.madsciencecomic.com/947/203-theoretical-physics
http://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/media/eps/schoolofmathematics/study/undergraduate/informationforcurrentstudents/pastexaminationpapers/scriptviewing/MATH20101.pdf
https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/imagination-in-kant-s-critique-of-practical-reason/
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_art_need_evidence_What_is_the_goal_of_art_and_science_Where_do_they_overlap
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2009/oct/29/art-meaning-bob-dylan
deck
By joharameyer
deck
- 265