Michael Küffmeier

Synthetic polarization maps around embedded protostars

Advisors: Zhi-Yun Li & Paola Caselli

Stars are born in large assemblies of gas

Star-disk systems form in different environments provided by Giant Molecular Clouds (Size: 10 - 100 pc)

Serpens SMM1 (Le Gouellec et al. 2019)

Zoom-in method

Küffmeier et al. 2017

  • adaptive mesh refinement
  • ideal magnetohydrodynamics
  • turbulence driven by supernovae
  • stars modelled as sink particles

Magnetic fields in simulation

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

...in bridge

Field strength in bridge: 

about 1 to 2 mG

...around primary protostar

Field strength close to foot point:

>100 mG

Dust polarization to measure magnetic fields

Polarization depends on degree of grain alignment and elongation

Credit: B. G. Anderson

Measuring linear polarization of dust grains allows to determine magnetic field orientation ...

... if alignment mechanism is known! 

Stokes vector: description of polarized light

Poincaré sphere; credit: wikipedia

Synthetic observation with POLARIS

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

Perfect alignment

assuming perfect alignment at 1.3 mm: polarization traces magnetic field structure

Synthetic dust polarization maps at 1.3 mm

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

Perfect alignment only

Emitted radiation

Polarization fraction in bridge: 

> 20 %

Polarization fraction in bridge:

a few %

assuming perfect alignment at 1.3 mm: polarization strength is overestimated

Synthetic dust polarization maps at 1.3 mm

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

Emitted radiation

Polarization fraction in bridge:

a few %

Polarization fraction in bridge:

up to 20 %

IRAS 16293--2422

Sadavoy et al. 2018

alignment efficiency higher than efficiency produced by standard RAT alignment

(also Le Goeullec+20)

Wavelength dependence: 1.3 mm vs 53 micron

Emitted radiation

1.3 mm: good tracer of magnetic field

53 micron: poor tracer of magnetic field

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

Two reasons for wavelength dependence

Küffmeier, Reißl et al. 2020

Self-scattering

Dichroic extinction

Take-away for scales beyond >100 au

< 200 micron: dichroic extinction and self-scattering; no trace of B

> 200 micron: thermal emission; linear polarization traces B

Results and outlook

Linear polarization of dust reemission at wavelength >200 micron is good tracer of magnetic field structure on scales >100 au

Goal: more synthetic polarization maps of protostellar sites

Credit: Pelkonen et al. 2021

X-formation_Feb2021

By kuffmeier

X-formation_Feb2021

  • 229