Moore's Law

History in Context


Dubious Definitions of "History"*:

  • History is just one damned thing after another...
  • What is history but a fable agreed upon?
  • An account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant.

However, it has also been said (by Cicero) that:
"The causes of events are ever more interesting
than the events themselves..."

*Be skeptical about the attributions of such quotes. They're often wrong, especially when Churchill is involved.

...but first, a digression...

A Series Of Tubes

On June 28th, 2006,
former Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens told the world:
"The internet is not a big truck. It’s a series of tubes."
This was something of a misunderstanding...

A Series Of Tubes



These are tubes --- vacuum tubes, aka thermionic valves.

Diodes


The simplest vacuum tube, the diode, is similar to an incandescent light bulb with an added electrode inside.

When the bulb's filament (cathode) is heated red-hot, electrons are "boiled" off its surface into the vacuum inside the bulb, and can be attracted to a positively charged plate (anode).

This flow can only happen in one direction.

Triodes


The triode adds a third element -- the "grid", which is used to control the flow from cathode to anode.

The voltage difference between grid and cathode governs the flow of electrons from cathode to anode.

This allows for electrically controlled switching, and even amplification, of the input signal.

What can you do with these?


Well, among other things, you can build
high-speed digital electronic computers
to help defeat Hitler and the Nazis!

(Later, you'll also be able to use them for playing games).

A Series Of Tubes

The Original Valve Steam Machine?


Using about 1,500 vacuum tubes (2,400 for Mk2), in 1944 
Colossus replaced a mostly electro-mechanical system
(the "Heath Robinson") for cracking Nazi codes.

Well, it did use valves (aka tubes), but it didn't use steam...
Once Colossus was built and installed, it ran continuously, powered by diesel generators (the steam-driven "mains" electricity supply being too unreliable in wartime).

Valves improved on relays, but were BIG and ran hot.
(After all, they were basically just overgrown light-bulbs!)

"As We May Think"


In 1945, Vannevar Bush wrote a classic essay called
"As We May Think", in which he speculated about a future
where miniaturisation made it possible for people to store huge amounts of information in (comparatively)
tiny amounts of physical space.

It contains one of the most brilliant and prescient understatements I've ever read...

"The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it."

Scaling the Valve


In 1947 a team at Bell Labs invented (or, arguably, re-invented) a small, low-powered, non-thermal, efficient, reliable, shock-resistant equivalent of the triode valve.

They called it the transistor.

And it changed the world.

The Transistor

(have you ever seen one in person?)

Lots of Transistors


Progress!


From our brief review of the history of computing
in the previous lecture, it's apparent that there was a tremendous amount of progress made over a fairly 
short period of time following the introduction of the
transistor and, from there, the "integrated circuit"
(aka "microchip") in the late 1950s.

There were obviously many factors involved in this,
but the underlying technological enabler was the remarkable increase in the number of transistors per chip.

From PONG to Pac-Man



In just 12 years! (1968 to 1980)
Thanks to a several 1000x increase in transistor count.

Moore's 1965 Paper


In 1965, an engineer called Gordon Moore (who would go
on to co-found Intel in 1968) wrote an article for Electronics magazine in which he anticipated a doubling of the
number of transistors per chip roughly ever year.

In around 1970, Carver Mead named this prediction as
"Moore's Law"

The original article makes for very interesting reading,
and it's only 3 pages long, so do please attempt it...

What Moore Actually Said


" Integrated circuits will lead to such wonders as home  computers—or at least terminals connected to a central  computer—automatic controls for automobiles,
and personal  portable communications equipment.

The electronic  wristwatch needs only a display
to be feasible today."
-- Gordon Moore, 1965


The Pulsar watch arrived in 1972. James Bond had one.

Cost per Component


"There is a minimum cost at any given time in the
evolution of the technology. At present [in 1965], it is
reached when 50 components are used per circuit...

The complexity for minimum component costs has increased at a rate of roughly a factor of two per year...

Over the longer term, the rate of increase is a bit more uncertain, although there is no reason to believe it will not remain nearly constant for at least 10 years."

The Cost Graph



Note the use of logarithmic scales.

The Component Graph



The basis for Moore's Extrapolation

Prediction is Difficult

...especially about the future

Moore also said:
"By 1975, the number of components per
integrated circuit for minimum cost will be 65,000. "

Reality said:
"The Intel 8085, introduced in 1976, had 6,500 transistors."

However, Moore was counting "components"... and Intel was apparently developing an (unreleased) 32,000 component (16,000 transistor) CCD memory chip in 1975.

Version 2.0


Actually, in 1975, Moore had already tweaked his prediction: he clarified the various contributions to the doubling trend (smaller components, larger chips, cleverer designs) and, based on his belief that the potential for "cleverer designs" was now reaching a limit, he revised his prediction downward to
a doubling every two years.

Here's an Intel-specific "infographic"
putting all of this into context.

A less Intel-centric version appears on the next slide...

Transistor Counts (to 2011)


Transistor Counts (to 2020)


Performance


These increases in transistor count also have an effect on overall performance: more transistors can perform more computations!

Also, smaller transistors can be run at higher clock-speeds, which compounds the benefits.

This led Moore's colleague David House to observe that,
under Moore's Law, overall chip performance would
double every 18 months.

Exponential!


This form of growth (or, indeed, decay) is properly called "exponential". It means that the rate of change is
proportional to the current value.

Which means you can also say:
"It changes by a fixed factor of f
 over some fixed period of time t".

It implies that, if you graph the trend on a logarithmic axis,
it will be a straight line.

Commonly Misused!


Not Exponential!


"Exponential" does not just mean "it grows really fast".

...or, even, "it grows by an ever increasing amount".

In particular, functions such as x^2 are not exponential.
(but 2^x, or a^bx, or e^x etc. are)

This observation is, perhaps, a bit pedantic for general usage, but it matters a lot in technical fields and is worth remembering.

Top Tips


A doubling every 1 year gives 10 doublings per decade.
2^10 is 1024, so that's approx 1000-fold increase per decade.

A doubling every 2 years gives 5 doublings per decade.
2^5 is 32, so that's approx 30-fold increase per decade.

A doubling every 1.5 years gives 6.6 doublings per decade.
2^6.6 is ~100, so that's approx 100-fold increase per decade
(or, equivalently, 10-fold every 5 years).

Learn Your Powers of Two


2^32 = 2^10 * 2^10 * 2^10 * 2^2
(because multiplication adds "powers")

= 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 4
= 4,294,967,296

Let's call it four billion.

Why?


So, Moore's Law has been a pretty good guide to 50+ years
of integrated circuit growth. But why does it hold?

The full set of reasons appears to be rather complex, but
it looks like a combination of ongoing improvements in manufacturing technology, driven by economic factors (demand, growth), and building on its own prior results.

It's also a well-known target that everyone in the industry
aims for in their planning, which leads it to be something
of a self-fulfilling prophecy!

Predictive Power


Over the years Moore's Law has been used by a lot of smart people to anticipate future developments, extrapolate trends, and, in the words of Wayne Gretzky,
"skate to where the puck is going, not to where it is".

Despite not being a true "Law", the fact that it actually gave some predictive power surely puts it ahead of most theories of history and/or economics, and arguably makes it something close to science. ;-)

Danny Hillis' Knob


I once met Danny Hillis, the founder of massively-parallel supercomputer manufacturer Thinking Machines Corp., 
and he told me that he'd projected in the 1970s that, as a consequence of Moore's Law etc., there would eventually
be more computers in the world than people.

"What will we do with them?" one man had asked, 
 incredulously, "Put them in doorknobs?"

The next time Hillis visited the hotel where this took place,
his room door had a computerised electronic lock in it.

Let's Take A Year Off!


Years ago, I read a paper by a researcher who was
working on some highly complex data-intensive task.
The data was going to take 4 years to process.

So, he proposed that his funders send him to the Bahamas for a year -- to do nothing -- trusting that Moore's Law etc. would, in that time, produce computers that were twice as powerful. Then they could buy one of those, and complete the work in a further 2 years (a year ahead of schedule).

It was a win-win situation! They didn't go for it though. :-(

Planning A Game


When you're planning a large-scale professional game (or, perhaps, one which you just expect to be around for a long period of time), using Moore's Law is hugely valuable...

One rule of thumb, with PC games, is that the best machine you can buy at the start of a 2 year project will be the minimum spec by the time you launch.

Misjudging this, in either direction, can be hazardous
to your success. Moore's Law matters!

Moore's Law In Action


Evolution of The Tomb Raider:


Will it continue?


In a finite world, exponential growth
cannot continue indefinitely.

There is a (molecular) limit to how small a transistor can possibly be, and practical limits about handling electrical interference effects at truly tiny scales.

Difficulties related to power-consumption and heat
dissipation are also constraining how much faster the
circuits can be clocked, which is why clock rates
have increased so little in recent years...

Something Changed in 2004


(taken from this fascinating article)

Hitting the wall in 2020?

That's what this guy, Pentium Pro architect Bob Colwell
(of Intel and DARPA) predicts... (in 2013)


On the other hand...


Throughout its life there have been claims that an end to Moore's Law is imminent, but a succession of technical breakthroughs has allowed it to continue.

There is still the possibility that some new form of technology will arise, allowing growth to continue beyond the expected near-term limits.

However, the tailing-off of clock speeds (about which the original law says nothing, remember!) is certainly real, alongside the corresponding move to multi-core systems.

"3D" Transistors (from 2011)



Intel's "10nm" tech (2017)


Getting to 5nm is HARD


"The 5 nm node was once assumed by some experts to be the end of Moore's law.
Transistors smaller than 7 nm will experience quantum tunnelling through their logic gates.
Due to the costs involved in development, 5 nm is predicted to take longer to reach market
than the 2 years estimated by Moore's Law. Beyond 7 nm, major technological advances
would have to be made; possible candidates include vortex laser, MOSFET-BJT dual-mode transistor, 3D packaging, microfluidic cooling, PCMOS, vacuum transistors, t-rays, extreme ultraviolet lithography, carbon nanotube transistors, silicon photonics, graphene, phosphorene, organic semiconductors, gallium arsenide, indium gallium arsenide, nano-patterning, and reconfigurable chaos-based microchips."

-- Wikipedia, July 2017

The Actual Status in 2020?


The Future?

I don't know --- but the transition to multi-core and
super-parallelism is very real. It still seems likely that "computers" will continue to increase in their overall
calculating abilities for a while yet, especially on
mobile devices, which is the growth area.

  • History is a pack of lies about events that never
    happened, told by people who weren't there.
  • History is merely a list of surprises.
    It can only prepare us to be surprised yet again.
  • History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.*
(*That last one is attributed to Winston Churchill.)

Questions to Consider


How many computers are there in the world?
How many new ones were made this year?

What counts as a computer?
(Your phone? Your car? Your washing machine?)

How many transistors are there in the world?
How many transistors are in this room?

How many people are there on Earth?
How many transistors per person?

Transistor Memories


Static RAM: Typically uses 6T (or 4T, 8T, 10T) per bit
Dynamic RAM: 1T (transistor) and 1C (capacitor) per bit
Flash Memory: 1T (or less... 1/2T, 1/3T, 1/4T!) per bit

Here's another map of global mobile-phone ownership.

Moore's Law

By Pat Kerr

Moore's Law

Some background on the famous Law

  • 5,611

More from Pat Kerr