Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Libraries
August 2023
PerlKohacon
- Kāi Tahu, Kāti Māmoe
- Nō Moeraki ahau
- One of the original Koha developers
- Kaihuawaere Matihiko at Catalyst IT
- Board member at Tohatoha (previously Creative Commons Aotearoa)
- Former board member National Digital Forum
- He Māwhitiwhiti ki te Kākahu o Hine-Raraunga at Te Kāhui Raraunga
- chrisc@catalyst.net.nz
Ko wai ahau?
Disclaimer
Te Mana Raraunga is a network of people advocating for Māori rights and interests in data. I don't represent them but we are people who share a kaupapa.
I am not speaking on behalf of my employers either.
Photo by Andrew Steinmetz CC-BY-SA
- A brief NZ history lesson
- Data Sovereignty
- Te Mana Raraunga
- CARE Principles
- Why it's important
- What can we do?
Agenda
He Whakaputanga
- Signed in 1835
- Declaration of Independence
- Set the scene for Te Tiriti o Waitangi
He whakaputanga was - and remains - proof the rangatiratanga and mana of Māori had been clearly articulated. New Zealand had been a sovereign land under the authority of the united tribes before 1840
Dr Vincent O'Malley
Te Tiriti o Waitangi
- First signed Feb 6 1840
- Given that almost all Māori signatories signed the Māori text, considerable weight should be given to that version.
- The contra proferentem rule that in the event of ambiguity such a provision should be construed against the party which drafted or proposed that provision (in this case the Crown) applies.
- Thus kawanatanga not rangatiratanga
UNDRIP
Finland voted for UNDRIP in 2007 and continues to voice support for it.
Finland supports the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), under which states are committed to consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples. We promote the consideration of the rights of indigenous peoples in the UN General Assembly, the UN Human Rights Council and its Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) as well as in the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous
Issues. The rights of indigenous peoples must be taken into account as part of the implementation of EU human rights policy.
Government of Finland Report on Human Rights Policy 2022
UNDRIP
As per inherent sovereignty rights underscored by UNDRIP, and recognition by nation- states, particularly Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the US, Indigenous peoples have the right to control the data about them.
Data sovereignty comes into play when an organisation’s data is stored outside of their country and is subject to the laws of the country in which the data resides.
The ability to exert control over where the data is stored, how it is used, and who it is used by.
Data Sovereignty
Narrow definition
My context
Māori Data Sovereignty supports a collective sovereign refusal that is both a shutting down of data colonialism, and a simultaneous opening up of an alternative relational approach to data and digital technologies that is grounded in tikanga.
Tahu Kukutai, Donna Cormack, Chris Cormack, 'Not one byte more' Ch 4, Shouting Zeros and Ones , 2020
Māori Data Sovereignty
Indigenous Data Sovereignty is concerned with the rights of Indigenous peoples to control data derived from and pertaining to them, and their knowledge systems, customs or territories.
Maggie Walter and Michele Suina, ‘Indigenous Data, Indigenous Methodologies and Indigenous Data Sovereignty’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22
Indigenous Data Sovereignty
What is Māori data?
Māori data refers to digital or digitisable information or knowledge that is about or from Māori people, our language, culture, resources or environments.
Indigenous Data is data from and about Indigenous communities and lands.
What is Indigenous Data?
Indigenous data refers to digital or digitisable information or knowledge that is about or from Indigenous people, their languages, cultures, resources or environments.
Te Mana Raraunga
The purpose of Te Mana Raraunga is to enable Māori Data Sovereignty and to advance Māori aspirations for collective and individual wellbeing by:
- Asserting Māori rights and interests in relation to data
- Ensuring data for and about Māori can be safeguarded and protected
- Requiring the quality and integrity of Maori data and its collection
- Advocating for Māori involvement in the governance of data repositories
- Supporting the development of Māori data infrastructure and security systems
- Supporting the development of sustainable Māori digital businesses and innovations
Principles of Māori Data Sovereignty
-
Rangatiratanga
-
Whakapapa
-
Whanaungatanga
-
Kotahitanga
-
Manaakitangi
-
Kaitiakitanga
Authority
Relationships
Obligations
Collective benefit
Reciprocity
Guardianship
Rangatiratanga
1.1 Control
1.2 Jurisdiction
1.3 Self-determination
Whakapapa
2.1 Context
2.2 Data Disaggregation
2.3 Future use
Te ao turoa: education kit. Auckland: Auckland War Memorial Museum Tamaki Paenga Hira, 2001, p. 15.
Whanaungatanga
3.1 Balancing rights
3.2 Accountabilities
Halswell School
Kotahitanga
4.1 Benefit
4.2 Build Capacity
4.3 Connect
Halswell School
Manaakitanga
5.1 Respect
5.2 Consent
Manaakitanga is an old word, but it remains a beautiful way of approaching relationships, whether they be between friends, family, clients or business associates. Living by the principles of manaakitanga means stopping to ask “whose mana am I encouraging?” and “am I elevating others?” – whether that be through words or actions. In uplifting others and giving them respect and aroha, we also hold our own mana in balance.
Kaitiakitanga
6.1 Guardianship
6.2 Ethics
6.3 Restrictions
The CARE Principles
Many Māori are sceptical that data-driven solutions can work without significant input from people with a Māori worldview at all points in the statistical pipeline, from problem formulation to data collection and analysis.
Caleb Moses - Shouting Zeros and Ones : Chapter 4 : The intergrated data infrastructure, 2020
He raru ki tai
The Investment Approach to Justice: Taking Integrated Offender Management to Police, Justice and the wider social sector - Tim Hughes Principal Adviser, Ministry of Justice
These life-course risk models will be built on the Integrated Data Infrastructure at Statistics NZ. This powerful database hosts a very wide range of anonymised information about all New Zealanders, including records about tax, earnings and employment records, health, education, and welfare receipt. We will use factors such as age, and early CYF involvement, to predict future offending and victimisation for the resident population of New Zealand.
Tētahi atu raru ki tai
Individuals in general experience the dispossession of their data, but marginalized persons and groups experience additional ways in which their data is “colonized” and used to further discriminate against them.
(Big) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism
- Monique Mann and Angela Daly
Collectors view the world in a particular way. Before the action of collecting begins, the person has designed 'the pretty', 'the object of desire', 'the resource' in their minds; they have composed collections with missing pieces; they have devised the search and the seeking. Their external world becomes a hunt, a trigger of recognition that shapes and manifests their desires. In this world, indigenous peoples live, being the collected, the named, the classified, the commons, the public domain, the protectors of the desired, the obstacles, the remnants, the fascinating, the reviled, the disappointing, the occupiers - a myriad of projections and illusions.
Cultures of Collecting - Cherryl Smith
- Do we know where data is being stored ?
- Can we get all of it out at any time ?
- Can we identify Indigenous data ?
- What access do we provide for Indigenous people to get their data ?
- Should we even be holding it ?
Questions for libraries to consider
So it encourages us to do this with data
So we must put stuff in context, not see things as isolated data points
We must understand the whakapapa of the data
And we must be attentive to history
This will make all data science better
Kaupapa Māori is always mindful of context
We are used to asking:
- What do we do with all these data?
- How do we catalogue them?
-
How should we use them?
Less often we consider the questions:
- Should we collect, aggregate, catalogue and exploit these data?
- If so, how?
- What would be ethical means for doing so?
The Good Data Manifesto
Good Data -Edited by Angela Daly, S. Kate Devitt and Monique Mann.
http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tod-29-good-data/
- Te Mana Raraunga
- Te Kāhui Raraunga
- US Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network (USIDSN)
- OCAP® (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession)
- Maiam nayri Wingara
Organisations working on Indigenous data sovereignty
Questions?
Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Libraries
By Chris Cormack
Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Libraries
- 221