Trends in AI and Academic Publishing

Catherine Gracey, Open Scholarship & Copyright Librarian

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI (GenAI) are often used interchangably 

A note on language

  • In this context, I'm talking about GenAI, unless I specify otherwise

[a]

Setting the Scene

The hype begins...

[a]

AI as "Author"

  • Accountability
  • Reliability
  • Credit for humans
  • Copyright?*

[a]

[b]

What you need to know as a researcher...

Artificial Intelligence

Academic Integrity

Generally...

[a]

  • GenAI can't be listed as an author
  • GenAI should not be cited as an information source (cite the original source)
  • GenAI use should be acknowledged in a statement 
  • (Public) GenAI should not be used for peer-review (major! privacy issues)

– Conrad Anker

– Conrad Anker

  • Check the policies of target journals well ahead of time, and check in regularly
  • Document AI use, keep records of your prompts, outputs, track changes, etc.
  • Ensure you're making meaningful contributions & changes to avoid tortured phrases, etc.

So, what should you do?

ChatGPT

ScopusAI

At the same time, publishers are embracing GenAI

[a]

[b]

Publishers are selling your work to AI Companies

 

  • For access to their data to train their AI models with:

    • Microsoft paid Taylor & Francis $10 million [a]

    • An unnamed company paid Wiley $23 million [b, c]

  • Many of these authors likely paid to get their work published (via APCs)

If publishers hold exclusive rights to your work, they have the authority to license it for various uses, including AI training, and financially benefit from these deals.

– Dede Dawson, 2024

Review Publishing/Copyright Agreements

 

  • Publishers can do this because authors have signed away the exclusive rights to their work in many cases

  • Authors did not explicitly consent to the sale of their work to AI companies, but had signed their rights away

  • There is very limited (or no) ability to opt out as authors

What you need to know as a consumer of research...

Alleged AI Generated Papers

[a]

[b]

Tortured Phrases

[a]

Best practices for screening the literature

Use tools that can search ACADEMIC sources & provide sources 

Otherwise you might be trusting a Reddit user

1

Look for original sources

Make sure the original source says what the GenAI output is saying (have hallucinations or misrepresentations occurred?)

2

Verify claims

3

Use tools like Retraction Watch & PubPeer to engage

Final Considerations

  • AI-generated content can't be copyrighted 
  • You may accidentally infringe on someone's copyright by imputing their work into GenAI tools

Copyright

Privacy

  • User data and content are stored/used by many GenAI tools, so should not be used for confidential purposes (i.e. peer review, meetings)

Resources

Connect with me:

catherine.gracey@unb.ca

Special shoutout to PubPeer and Retraction Watch!!

Thank You!

AI Trends and Academic Publishing

By Catherine Gracey

AI Trends and Academic Publishing

  • 123