Portraits
Alternate Histories
I. Research (30 points)
Sources (10 points): Students should use at least three different sources, with at least one being the Aeneid.
Depth (10 points): The depth of the research should reflect a thorough understanding of the character. Look for a wide variety of descriptors, not just the most common or obvious ones.
Citation (10 points): All sources should be correctly cited according to the appropriate style (MLA, APA, etc.).
II. Analysis (30 points)
Understanding of Character (15 points): The students should demonstrate an understanding of the character's role in the Aeneid and any other works they're discussed in.
Use of Descriptors (15 points): The students should explain how the descriptors they've chosen reflect the character's personality, actions, and role.
III. Creativity (20 points)
Artistic Representation (10 points): The portrait should be thoughtful and creative, showing the character in a way that reflects the research done.
Incorporation of Descriptors (10 points): The descriptors should be incorporated into the portrait in a way that makes sense and adds depth to the representation.
IV. Presentation (20 points)
Written Reflection (10 points): Students should write a brief reflection explaining their research process, their analysis, and how they incorporated their findings into their portrait.
Oral Presentation (10 points): Students should present their portrait to the class, explaining their work and answering any questions their classmates or you might have.
I. Research (25 points)
Sources (10 points): Each group should use at least three different sources, with at least one being a primary source (like the Aeneid or another Latin work).
Depth (10 points): The research should reflect a thorough understanding of the historical context, the character or event in question, and the potential consequences of the hypothetical change.
Citation (5 points): All sources should be correctly cited according to the appropriate style (MLA, APA, etc.).
II. Analysis (25 points)
Understanding of Context (10 points): The students should demonstrate an understanding of the original historical or literary context.
Plausible Changes (15 points): The students should propose plausible changes that could have occurred if the hypothetical event had happened.
III. Creativity (20 points)
Narrative Construction (10 points): The group should construct a compelling narrative around their alternate history scenario.
Integration of Research (10 points): The research and analysis should be seamlessly integrated into the narrative, informing the characters, events, and outcomes.
IV. Presentation (30 points)
Written Report (15 points): The group should provide a written report detailing their research, analysis, and narrative.
Oral Presentation (15 points): The group should present their alternate history to the class, explaining their work and answering any questions their classmates or you might have.
Aeneid 4.160-177
Copy of latinAP-week21-day2
By jaalin
Copy of latinAP-week21-day2
We translate our prepared lines up through 4.685-705 and review the 4th Declension
- 21