Jesse Bloom PRO
Scientist studying evolution of proteins and viruses.
Interpreting the evolution
of SARS-CoV-2
Jesse Bloom
Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center / HHMI
Slides at https://slides.com/jbloom/interpreting-sars-cov-2-evolution
Evolution was historically studied by examining changes in phenotype
~55 years ago, it became possible to also study evolution in terms of genotype
How changes in genotype affect phenotype is complex
"There is no reason to expect that the extent of functional change in a polypeptide chain is proportional to the number of amino-acid substitutions... It is the type rather than the number of substitutions that is decisive."
We can now characterize evolution of genotype at high resolution
Phylogenetic tree of 2,734,215 full-length SARS-CoV-2 genomes provided by GISAID
We want to know how changes in genotype affect phenotype
The Coronavirus Is Mutating. What Does That Mean For Us?
The Coronavirus Is Mutating. What Does That Mean For Us?
"There is no reason to expect that the extent of functional change in a polypeptide chain is proportional to the number of amino-acid substitutions... It is the type rather than the number of substitutions that is decisive."
biochemical phenotypes
- protein folding
- affinity for ACE2
- binding by antibodies
Protein structure matters implicitly, as it largely determines mapping from mutation to phenotype.
-Asn-Ile-Thr-Asn-Leu-
-Asn-Ile-Thr-Glu-Leu-
-Asn-Lys-Thr-Asn-Leu-
My lab studies how changes in genotype affect phenotype for viral proteins
Outline
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
- How mutations affect antibody recognition of RBD
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
- How mutations affect antibody recognition of RBD
SARS-CoV-2 virions are decorated by spike proteins that mediate viral entry
virion image from https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23312
See Tortorici and Veesler (2019) for general review on coronavirus spikes.
See Walls et al (2020) and Wrapp et al (2020) for details on structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike.
A key portion of the spike is the receptor-binding domain (RBD)
The RBD binds ACE2 receptor on cells
Neutralizing antibodies target spike; often bind RBD and block interaction with ACE2
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
- How mutations affect antibody recognition of RBD
Only sometimes does virus evolution lead to changes in antigenic phenotype
- Measles virus: Does not evolve to escape immunity. People are infected at most once in their lives. A vaccine developed in the 1960s still works today.
- Influenza virus: Evolves to escape immunity. People are infected every ~5 years. The vaccine needs to be updated annually.
Initially, many people suggested coronaviruses didn't evolve antigenically
Coronaviruses are the only RNA viruses with a proofreading polymerase (Denison et al, 2011), meaning they have a lower mutation rate than influenza or measles virus
Not a good argument
Evolution isn't just mutation. Rather, it involves three related factors:
- The rate at which mutations arise.
- The phenotypic impact of these mutations.
- How selection (and drift) act on these mutations.
"The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior."
There is no past behavior of SARS-CoV-2 to study, but we can look to its relatives
We studied CoV-229E, a coronavirus that causes common colds and has been circulating in humans since at least the 1960s.
Reconstructing evolution of CoV-229E spike
We experimentally generated CoV-229E spikes at ~8 year intervals so we could study them in the lab:
- 1984
- 1992
- 2001
- 2008
- 2016
Evolution of CoV-229E spike erodes neutralization by human antibody immunity
Serum collected in 1985 neutralizes virus with spike from 1984, but less effective against more recent viruses.
Viral evolution erodes antibody immunity of different people at different rates
We are studying basis of these differences, as ideally vaccines would elicit more evolution-resistant sera as on the right.
Most mutations in RBD & NTD
Plot of sequence variability across CoV-229E spike taken from Eguia, ..., Bloom, PLoS Pathogens (2021) . See also Wong, ..., Rini, Nature Communications (2017) and Li, ..., Rini, eLife (2019) for detailed structural studies of evolution in receptor-binding loops.
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
- How mutations affect antibody recognition of RBD
For SARS-CoV-2 RBD, want to prospectively map how each mutation affects phenotype
Impossible to measure true viral fitness in the lab, so we focus on three biochemical phenotypes that contribute to fitness:
1) Does RBD fold properly?
2) Does RBD bind ACE2 with high affinity?
3) Is RBD bound by anti-viral antibodies?
For SARS-CoV-2 RBD, want to prospectively map how each mutation affects phenotype
Impossible to measure true viral fitness in the lab, so we focus on three biochemical phenotypes that contribute to fitness:
1) Does RBD fold properly?
2) Does RBD bind ACE2 with high affinity?
3) Is RBD bound by anti-viral antibodies?
Evolutionary pressure is to maintain these two phenotypes...
... while changing this phenotype.
We use yeast display to enable high-throughput experiments
RBD
fluorescent ACE2
yeast
fluorescent tag on RBD
Importantly, we use ACE2 titrations to measure true affinities, not just relative FACS binding signal; see here for details.
Library of yeast, each expressing different RBD mutant with identifying 16 nt barcode
Click here for details on how library is made.
Phenotypic maps of how mutations affect RBD folding & ACE2 affinity
Outline
- SARS-CoV-2 spike and its receptor-binding domain (RBD)
- How do coronavirus spikes evolve?
- How mutations affect function of RBD
- How mutations affect antibody recognition of RBD
We map escape mutations by sorting for RBD variants that don't bind antibody
RBD
fluorescently labeled antibody
yeast
fluorescent tag on RBD
Escape map from a single antibody
Escape maps from lots of antibodies
Infection / vaccination elicit polyclonal antibodies that can bind many epitopes
Monoclonal antibodies bind one epitope, so can usually be escaped by single mutation
Polyclonal antibodies can bind many epitopes, so often more resistant to escape
Extent of focusing of polyclonal antibodies shapes antigenic evolution
- For influenza virus, human polyclonal antibody immunity often highly focused, such that single mutations can reduce neutralization by >10 fold. (Lee et al, eLife, 2019)
- For measles virus, polyclonal antibodies target many epitopes with similar potency, so no single mutation has a large effect. (Munoz-Alia, Cell Rep. Med., 2021)
RBD-binding antibodies are responsible for most neutralizing activity
Data from Greaney et al (2021a, 2021b) using lentiviral pseudotypes on ACE2-overexpressing cells. Similar results seen by Piccoli et al (2020). Neutralizing antibodies can target other spike regions such as NTD (e.g., McCallum et al, 2021).
RBD-binding antibodies are responsible for most neutralizing activity
Data from Greaney et al (2021a, 2021b) using lentiviral pseudotypes on ACE2-overexpressing cells. Similar results seen by Piccoli et al (2020). Neutralizing antibodies can target other spike regions such as NTD (e.g., McCallum et al, 2021).
RBD-binding antibodies are responsible for most neutralizing activity
Data from Greaney et al (2021a, 2021b) using lentiviral pseudotypes on ACE2-overexpressing cells. Similar results seen by Piccoli et al (2020). Neutralizing antibodies can target other spike regions such as NTD (e.g., McCallum et al, 2021).
Single antibody class makes largest contribution, and mRNA vaccine induces broader binding
If polyclonal antibodies bind multiple epitopes, escape needs multiple mutations
We can visualize escape from different antibody classes
Conclusions
Relating change in genotype to phenotype is an old challenge in evolutionary biology
"There is no reason to expect that the extent of functional change in a polypeptide chain is proportional to the number of amino-acid substitutions... It is the type rather than the number of substitutions that is decisive."
Relating change in genotype to phenotype is an old challenge in evolutionary biology
The Coronavirus Is Mutating. What Does That Mean For Us?
Relating change in genotype to phenotype is an old challenge in evolutionary biology
"There is no reason to expect that the extent of functional change in a polypeptide chain is proportional to the number of amino-acid substitutions... It is the type rather than the number of substitutions that is decisive."
It's increasingly the bottleneck, since we've gotten good at obtaining genotypes
Phylogenetic tree of 2,734,215 full-length SARS-CoV-2 genomes provided by GISAID
We are working to characterize phenotype at comparable scale
Crowe lab (Vanderbilt): James Crowe, Seth Zost, Pavlo Gilchuk
Chu lab (Univ Wash): Helen Chu, Caitlin Wolf
Veesler lab (Univ Wash): David Veesler, Alexandra Walls, Ale Tortorici
King lab (Univ Wash): Neil King, Dan Ellis
Li lab (Brigham & Women's): Jonathan Li, Manish Choudhary
Whelan lab (Wash U)
Boeckh lab (Fred Hutch): Terry Stevens-Ayers
Alex Greninger (Univ Wash)
Janet Englund (Seattle Children's)
-
Adam Dingens
-
Will Hannon
-
Amin Addetia
-
Keara Malone
Tyler Starr
Allie Greaney
Rachel Eguia
Bloom lab (Fred Hutch)
Sarah Hilton
Kate Crawford
Andrea Loes
interpreting-sars-cov-2-evolution
By Jesse Bloom
interpreting-sars-cov-2-evolution
Interpreting the evolution of SARS-CoV-2
