Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors

Zhao et al.
Radiation Oncology 2020

Background

 

  • SBRT is standard for early stage inoperable NSCLC
  • Central tumors (within 2cm of proximal airways) have higher toxicity risk
  • Ultracentral tumors (abutting proximal airways) carry even higher risk
  • No consensus on optimal dose/fractionation for central/ultracentral tumors
  • Key question: Should we prioritize target coverage or OAR constraints?

Study Design

 

  • Retrospective analysis of provincial protocol
  • All central/ultracentral lung tumors treated with SBRT 60 Gy in 8 fractions from 2013-2017
  • Practice was to compromise target coverage to meet OAR constraints if needed
  • Primary lung tumors and metastases included
  • 4D-CT based planning with motion encompassing ITV approach

Patient Selection Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Central tumors (either):
    • Within 2cm of proximal bronchial tree
    • PTV overlapping mediastinal/pericardial pleura
  • Ultracentral tumors (PTV overlapping):
    • Proximal bronchial tree
    • Esophagus
    • Pulmonary artery/vein
  • Primary lung tumors or metastases
  • Treatment from 2013-2017

Exclusion Criteria

  • Multiple lesions in single PTV
  • Prior treatment to target area
  • Non-standard dose/fractionation
    • Must be 60 Gy in 8 fractions

Patient Population

 

  • 98 total patients
  • 57 central tumors (58.2%)
  • 41 ultracentral tumors (41.8%)
  • 76 primary lung tumors (77.6%)
  • 22 metastases (22.4%)
  • Median follow-up: 22.9 months
  • Patient characteristics well-balanced between groups

Treatment Planning

 

  • 60 Gy in 8 fractions prescribed to 90% isodose line
  • 4D-CT based ITV with 5mm PTV margin
  • Planning goals:
    • 95% of PTV covered by prescription dose
    • 99% of PTV receiving 54 Gy
  • OAR constraints prioritized over target coverage
  • 3D conformal, IMRT or VMAT planning allowed
Structure Constraint Value
Spinal cord Dmax < 30.6 Gy
Proximal bronchial tree D0.035 cc < 46.3 Gy
Proximal trachea D0.035 cc < 46.3 Gy
Esophagus D0.035 cc < 40 Gy
Great vessels D0.035 cc < 65 Gy
Brachial plexus D0.035 cc < 35 Gy
Heart D0.035 cc < 46 Gy
V39 Gy < 15 cc
Both lungs Dmean < 7 Gy
V26 Gy < 10%
Normal lung > 1500 cc < 14 Gy
Chest wall* D0.035 cc < 68 Gy
V45 Gy < 30 cc

Planning Dose Constraints - 60 Gy in 8 Fractions

Primary Results

Local Control:

  • 1-year: 97.8%
  • 2-year: 93.7%
  • 3-year: 84.5%


Overall Survival:

  • 1-year: 92.7%
  • 2-year: 79.8%
  • 3-year: 72.9%
  • Median: 55.6 months

 

Primary Results

Local Control:

  • 1-year: 97.8%
  • 2-year: 93.7%
  • 3-year: 84.5%


Overall Survival:

  • 1-year: 92.7%
  • 2-year: 79.8%
  • 3-year: 72.9%
  • Median: 55.6 months

 

Target Coverage Analysis

  • 54.1% - Optimal coverage (ITV & PTV V60Gy >95%)
  • 29.6% - Compromised PTV only (ITV V60Gy >95%, PTV <95%)
  • 16.3% - Compromised ITV & PTV (both <95%)
  • No significant difference in local control between groups (p=0.717)
  • ITV size was only significant predictor of local control on multivariate analysis

Treatment-Related Toxicity

Central Tumors (n=57)

  • Total Grade 3 Events: 3 patients (5.3%)
    • Chronic dyspnea requiring O2: 2 patients
    • Radiation pneumonitis: 1 patient
  • Timing:
    • Pneumonitis: 45 days post-RT
    • Dyspnea: 117 and 790 days post-RT

Ultracentral Tumors (n=41)

  • Total Grade 3 Events: 2 patients (4.9%)
    • Chronic dyspnea requiring O2: 1 patient
    • Recurrent hemoptysis: 1 patient
  • Timing:
    • Dyspnea: 182 days post-RT
    • Hemoptysis: 346 days post-RT

DVH Parameters and Associated Toxicity

Pulmonary Toxicity

  • Grade 3 pneumonitis associated with:
    • Mean lung dose > 7 Gy
    • V20 > 10%
    • Pre-existing ILD increased risk

Bronchial Toxicity

  • Hemoptysis risk increased with:
    • D0.035cc > 46.3 Gy to bronchial tree
    • Tumor abutting bronchial structures

Other Critical Structures

  • No high-grade esophageal toxicity
    • D0.035cc kept < 40 Gy
  • No cardiac toxicity observed
    • V39 < 15cc respected
    • D0.035cc < 46 Gy maintained
  • No great vessel complications
    • D0.035cc < 65 Gy achieved

High-Grade & Life-Threatening Toxicities

Study Results

  • No Grade 4-5 toxicities observed
  • One case of significant hemoptysis (Grade 3)
    • Ultracentral location
    • Required multiple hospitalizations
    • Onset at 346 days post-treatment
  • No bronchial/esophageal perforations
  • No treatment-related deaths

Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • Prioritization of OAR constraints over target coverage
  • Use of protracted fractionation (8 fractions)
  • Careful patient selection
    • Assessment of pre-existing conditions
    • Evaluation of tumor location relative to critical structures
  • Comparison to Literature:
    • Lower rate of severe toxicity than other series
    • Particularly compared to 5-fraction regimens

Limitations

  • Retrospective design
  • Relatively short median follow-up (22.9 months)
  • Small number of local failure events (n=11)
  • Potential selection bias in patient selection
  • Late toxicities may not be captured
  • No respiratory gating/tracking used

Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors

By RadMedSkiier

Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors

Journal club presentation on Zhao et al. Radiation Oncology 2020

  • 35