The Cattening


Project format
- Six (student) developers
- Colocated (and same-cultured, ref. Pettigrew, Woodman, and Cameron 2001)
- 8 weeks to start a project
- Engage average users
- (New) user profiles
- Use gathered data in a fun way
- Only kind of consulting

(Consulting Lifecycle as inspiration)


Structure
We were outsiders
(O'Mahoney & Markham 2013)
- Partial delivery
- Alignment was difficult
- Complicated handover(?)
Result


Background: change was already happening
- Moving from desktop & mobile to responsive mobile
- Technical restructuring to "microservice" architecture (imperative for our project)
- "Annual" restructuring of teams and human resources
We (naturally) brought a few changes as well
- Tie the users closer to the profile
- Integrated the (new) profile further into the service
- Communicated through company wiki & one meeting – not good (O'Mahoney & Markham 2013)
- Communicated through company wiki & one meeting – not good (O'Mahoney & Markham 2013)
- Demonstrated a short term win for new technological architecture (Kotter 1995)
There were several potential issues
- No capacity ⟶ project dies
- Reality as of today
- Reality as of today
- Internal
- Missing alignment
- ... or commitment?
- High-level communication
- Complex handover
- External
- The users don't respond
- Company commitment changes
Soft skills were required
- Alignment with strategy
- Bring actual value (testing + KPIs)
(Kotter 1995)
- Internal team communication & task management (O'Mahoney & Markham 2003, Hargie 2011, Joseph et al. 2010)
- High-level communication and negotiation with "client"
(O'Mahoney & Markham 2003)- Graphs speak volumes
- Mapping results to strategy works

Soft skills + tech = success
- Continuous high-level communication
- Clearly defined goal for the project
- Clearly defined goal for the project
- Agile project management (kind of matters)
- Continuous deliveries, minor changes (e.g., Luftman 2009)
- Handover seems to have gone well
- Decisions were documented
(O'Mahoney & Markham 2013)
- Decisions were documented
- No real project review: not a consultancy project
References
-
Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice. Fifth edition. UK: Routledge
-
Joseph, D.; Ang, S.; Chang, R.; Slaughter, S. (2010). "Practical Intelligence in IT: Assessing Soft Skills of IT Professionals". Communications of the ACM. Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 149-154.
- Kotter, J. (1995). "Leading change: why transformation efforts fail". Harvard Business Review. March-April 1995.
- Luftman, J. (2009). Managing the Information Technology Resource. Second Kindle edition.
-
O'Mahoney, J. & Markham, C. (2013). Management Consultancy. Second edition. USA: Oxford University Press
- Pettigrew, A.; Woodman, R.; Cameron, K. (2001). "Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research". Academy of Management Journal 2001, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 697-713.
MS310: The Cattening
By theneva
MS310: The Cattening
- 532