Large deviations of the giant in spatial random graphs
Joost Jorritsma
joint with Júlia Komjáthy, Dieter Mitsche



Chennai Mathematical Institute, December '24
Supercritical Erdős–Rényi random graph \(G(n, \lambda/n)\)
[Erdős, Rényi '59; ...; O'Connell '98; Andreis, König, Langhammer, Patterson'23]
Exponential growth of neighbourhood
The largest component

Supercritical bond percolation on \(\mathbb{Z}^d\)

[Alexander, Chayes, Chayes '90; Cerf '00; Gandolfi '88; Grimmett & Marstrand '90, Kesten & Zhang '90, Pisztora '96, ...]
Surface-tension driven behavior
The largest component

Soft Poisson Boolean model
Edge set \(\mathcal{E}_\infty\)
- \(\{u\leftrightarrow v \}\Longleftrightarrow \{w_u^{1/d}+w_v^{1/d}\ge \|x_u-x_v\|\}\)
- Long-range parameter \(\alpha>1\),
- Percolation \(p\in(0,1]\)
Connection probability
$$\mathbb{P}\big(u\leftrightarrow v\mid \mathcal{V}_\infty\big)=\phantom{p\bigg(}\frac{ w_u^{1/d}+ w_v^{1/d}}{\|x_u-x_v\|}\wedge 1\phantom{\bigg)^{\alpha d}}$$
$$\mathbb{P}\big(u\leftrightarrow v\mid \mathcal{V}_\infty\big)=\phantom{p}\bigg(\frac{ w_u^{1/d}+ w_v^{1/d}}{\|x_u-x_v\|}\wedge 1\bigg)^{\alpha d}$$
Vertex set \(\mathcal{V}_\infty\)
- Locations: Poisson point process intensity \(\beta>0\)
- Power-law i.i.d. weights \(\tau>2\):
\(\mathbb{P}(w_v\ge w)=w^{-(\tau-1)}\), \(w\ge 1\)
$$\mathbb{P}\big(u\leftrightarrow v\mid \mathcal{V}_\infty\big)=p\bigg(\frac{w_u^{1/d}+ w_v^{1/d}}{\|x_u-x_v\|}\wedge 1\bigg)^{\alpha d}$$




$$(\mathrm{deg}(v) \mid w_v=w) \, = \, \mathrm{Poi}(c_{\alpha, d, \tau}p\beta \cdot w)$$
Soft Poisson Boolean model




Supercriticality assumption
- \(\theta=\theta_{d, \tau, \alpha, p}(\beta):=\mathbb{P}_{d, \tau, \alpha, p, \beta}^0(0\leftrightarrow \infty)\)
- \(\beta>\beta_c(\alpha, \tau, d, p):=\inf\{\beta: \theta(\beta)>0\}\)
Edge set \(\mathcal{E}_\infty\)
- \(\{u\leftrightarrow v \}\Longleftrightarrow \{w_u^{1/d}+w_v^{1/d}\ge \|x_u-x_v\|\}\)
- Long-range parameter \(\alpha>1\),
- Percolation \(p\in(0,1]\)
Vertex set \(\mathcal{V}_\infty\)
- Locations: Poisson point process intensity \(\beta>0\)
- Power-law i.i.d. weights \(\tau>2\):
\(\mathbb{P}(w_v\ge w)=w^{-(\tau-1)}\), \(w\ge 1\)
Soft Poisson Boolean model
Questions:
Fixed parameters:
- Point process on \(\mathbb{R}^d\) intensity \(\beta>0\)
- Power-law exponent \(\tau>2\)
- Long-range parameter \(\alpha>1\)
- Percolation \(p\in(0,1]\)
[Gracar, Lüchtrath, Mönch '21]
- When is \(\beta_c<\infty\)?
- \(d\ge 2\),
- Size of the largest connected component \(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}|\)
- Law of large numbers (\(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}|/n\to \theta\))?
- surface-tension behav. in \(\mathbb{P}(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}|/n<\theta-\varepsilon)\)?
- exponential decay of \(\mathbb{P}(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}|/n>\theta+\varepsilon)\)?
or \(d=1\), and \(\alpha\in(1, 2\vee\alpha_\tau)\)



Power-law weights
Constant weights
Lower tail*:
If \(\mathbb{E}[\# \text{edges of length } n^{1/d}]\to\infty\)
Main result: large deviations for the giant component
*log-corrections at non-unique maxima
Upper tail:
If non-critical
*at continuity points of \(I(\theta+\varepsilon)\)
Biskup ['04]
Lower tail: a too small largest component

Goal 1: Law of large numbers
+ local convergence (Giant is almost local)
[vdHofstad, vdHoorn, Maitra '21, vdHofstad '21]
Goal 2: Prove the theorem
\[\lim_{k\to\infty}\lim_{n\to\infty}\mathbb{P}^0(|\mathcal{C}_n(0)|>k, 0\notin\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}) =0\]
\(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(2)}|=\Theta(\mathrm{polylog}(n))\)
Edge set \(\mathcal{E}_\infty\)
- Long-range parameter \(\alpha>1\),
- Percolation \(p\in(0,1]\)
Connection probability
Vertex set \(\mathcal{V}_\infty\)
- Locations: Poisson point process intensity \(\beta>0\)
- Power-law i.i.d. weights \(\tau>2\):
\(\mathbb{P}(w_v\ge w)=w^{-(\tau-1)}\), \(w\ge 1\)
$$\mathbb{P}\big(u\leftrightarrow v\mid \mathcal{V}_\infty\big)=p\bigg(\frac{w_u^{1/d}+ w_v^{1/d}}{\|x_u-x_v\|}\wedge 1\bigg)^{\alpha d}$$




Goal 2 Prove


Power-law weights
Constant weights
Lower tail*:
If \(\mathbb{E}[\# \text{edges of length } n^{1/d}]\to\infty\)
Main result: large deviations for the giant component
*log-corrections at phase transition
Upper tail:
If non-critical
*at continuity points of \(I(\theta+\varepsilon)\)
Upper tail: polynomial decay when \(\tau<\infty\)

Related work:
- Sum of iid Par(\(\tau)\): principle of single jump.
- Large deviations # edges \(E_n\) (vdHvdHKMM '24)
\(\mathbb{P}(E_n>\mathbb{E}[E_n] +n\nu)=^\ast (1+o(1))c_\nu n^{-(\tau-2)\lceil\nu/p\rceil}\). - Inhomogeneous random graphs (J., Zwart '24+)
\(\mathbb{P}\big(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(1)}|/n>\rho\big)=^\ast (1+o(1))C_\rho n^{-(\tau-2)\lceil \widetilde h(\rho)\rceil}.\)
$$\mathbb{P}\big(u\leftrightarrow v\mid \mathcal{V}_\infty\big)=p\bigg(\frac{w_u^{1/d}+w_v^{1/d}}{\|x_u-x_v\|^d}\wedge 1\bigg)^{d\alpha}$$
Challenge: Capture dependency on percolation \(p\)



Power-law weights
Long-range percolation
Lower tail*:
If \(\mathbb{E}[\# \text{edges of length } n^{1/d}]\to\infty\)
Main result: large deviations for the giant component
*log-corrections at phase transition
Upper tail:
If non-critical, \(\rho\in(\theta, 1)\)
*at continuity points of \(I(\rho)\)
Supercritical bond percolation on \(\mathbb{Z}^d\)

[Alexander, Chayes, Chayes '90; Cerf '00; Gandolfi '88; Grimmett & Marstrand '90, Kesten & Zhang '90, Pisztora '96]
Surface-tension driven behavior
The largest component

Lower tail large deviations of the giant*:
One decay exponent governing cluster sizes
*log(log)-corrections at non-unique maxima \(\zeta\)
Small components*:
If \(\mathbb{E}[\# \text{edges of length } n^{1/d}]\to\infty\)
If \(\zeta>(d-1)/d\)

Thank you!

-
Cluster-size decay in supercritical long-range percolation;
With Júlia Komjáthy, Dieter Mitsche;
Electronic Journal of Probability (2024). -
Cluster-size decay in supercritical KSRGs;
With Júlia Komjáthy, Dieter Mitsche;
arXiv: 2303.00712, Annals of Probability (to appear). -
Large deviations of the giant in supercritical KSRGs;
With Júlia Komjáthy, Dieter Mitsche;
Preprint arXiv: 2404.02984.
Lower bounds: cluster-size decay
Aim: Find minimal \(\zeta\) s.t.
Aim: Find \(\gamma\) s.t.
Lower bounds: cluster-size decay
Aim: Find minimal \(\zeta\) s.t.
Aim: Find \(\gamma\) s.t.
Lower bounds: large deviations
(FKG)




Lower bounds: \(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(2)}|\)
\(\delta\) small
Upper bound: \(|\mathcal{C}_n^{(2)}|\)









(Second-)largest component in supercritical spatial random graphs
- Cluster-size decay
- Second-largest component
Open problems:
-
Largest component:
- Linear in box size
- Law of large numbers
- Large deviations
Answered questions (\(d=1\))
- Phase transition boundaries.
- Partial results \(d\ge 2\)
- Extension from PPP to grid
- Central limit theorem






- \(\zeta\in\big[(d-1)/d, 1\big)\)
Lower bounds
Upper bounds
Lower bounds
Upper bounds
Lower bounds
Upper bounds

Copy of Largest component in spatial random graphs
By joostjor
Copy of Largest component in spatial random graphs
- 501