Lin2-Xor Membership Proofs
Suyash Bagad
Merkle Tree
- Suppose we want to store \(2^{k}\) files in a decentralized and succinct way
\(h = H\big(\)
\(\big)\)
- Here, \(h\) indeed is a succinct representation of the files \(\{f_i\}_{i \in [8]}\)
- The problem is: to check if a file in included in \(h\), you need all \(\{f_i\}_{i \in [8]}\) files
- A better way to achieve this is using Merkle trees!
\(f_1\)
\(f_2\)
\(f_3\)
\(f_4\)
\(f_5\)
\(f_6\)
\(f_7\)
\(f_8\)
Merkle Tree
- Suppose we want to store \(2^{k}\) files in a decentralized and succinct way
\(f_1\)
\(f_2\)
\(f_3\)
\(f_4\)
\(f_5\)
\(f_6\)
\(f_7\)
\(f_8\)
\(H(f_1)\)
\(H(f_2)\)
\(H(f_3)\)
\(H(f_4)\)
\(H(f_5)\)
\(H(f_6)\)
\(H(f_7)\)
\(H(f_8)\)
Merkle Tree
- Suppose we want to store \(2^{k}\) files in a decentralized and succinct way
\(H(f_1)\)
\(H(f_2)\)
\(H(f_3)\)
\(H(f_4)\)
\(H(f_5)\)
\(H(f_6)\)
\(H(f_7)\)
\(H(f_8)\)
\(H'(H(f_1), H(f_2))\)
\(H'(H(f_3), H(f_4))\)
\(H'(H(f_5), H(f_6))\)
\(H'(H(f_7), H(f_8))\)
\(h^1_1\)
\(h^1_2\)
\(h^1_3\)
\(h^1_4\)
\(h^2_1\)
\(h^2_2\)
\(h^3_1\)
\(H'(h^1_1, h^1_2)\)
\(H'(h^1_3, h^1_4)\)
\(H'(h^2_1, h^2_2)\)
Merkle Tree
\(H(f_1)\)
\(H(f_2)\)
\(H(f_3)\)
\(H(f_4)\)
\(H(f_5)\)
\(H(f_6)\)
\(H(f_7)\)
\(H(f_8)\)
\(h^1_1\)
\(h^1_2\)
\(h^1_3\)
\(h^1_4\)
\(h^2_1\)
\(h^2_2\)
\(h^3_1\)
- Indeed, \(h_1^3\) is succinct form of the files. How do we prove inclusion?
Merkle Tree
\(H(f_1)\)
\(H(f_2)\)
\(H(f_3)\)
\(H(f_4)\)
\(H(f_5)\)
\(H(f_6)\)
\(H(f_7)\)
\(H(f_8)\)
\(h^1_1\)
\(h^1_2\)
\(h^1_3\)
\(h^1_4\)
\(h^2_1\)
\(h^2_2\)
\(h^3_1\)
- Indeed, \(h_1^3\) is succinct form of the files. How do we prove inclusion?
Merkle Tree
\(H(f_1)\)
\(H(f_2)\)
\(H(f_3)\)
\(H(f_4)\)
\(H(f_5)\)
\(H(f_6)\)
\(H(f_7)\)
\(H(f_8)\)
\(h^1_1\)
\(h^1_2\)
\(h^1_3\)
\(h^1_4\)
\(h^2_1\)
\(h^2_2\)
\(h^3_1\)
- Only \(\left( H(f_6), h^1_4, h_1^2 \right)\) are enough to prove inclusion of \(f_5\)! Sister nodes!
DL Based Merkle Tree
- Suppose \(\{L_i, R_i\}_{i\in [4]} \in \mathbb{G}^{8}\) and the node operation be \(H : \mathbb{G}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{G}\) s.t. \(H(L, R) \coloneqq L + x^jR\) for some \(x \in \mathbb{F}_p, \ j \in \mathbb{N}\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(h^1_1\)
\(h^1_2\)
\(h^1_3\)
\(h^1_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1^2\)
\(x_1^3\)
\(x_1^4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(h^2_1\)
\(h^2_2\)
\(x_2\)
\(x_2^2\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(h^3_1\)
\(1\)
\(x_3\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 1(a): Generate \(q_1 \leftarrow \mathbb{F}_p\) and send \(H_1 = q_1^{-1}l \cdot R_6\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 1(b): Send \(r_1 = q_1\left(y_1 - \frac{r}{l}\right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 2(a): Generate \(q_2 \leftarrow \mathbb{F}_p\)Â and send \(H_2 = q_2^{-1} l \left( L_5 + x_1R_5 \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 2(b): Send \(r_2 = q_2 \left( x_2^{-1} - \frac{r}{l} \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 3(a): Gen \(q_3 \leftarrow \mathbb{F}_p\)Â and send \(H_3 = q_3^{-1} l \left( y_2^{-1}(L_7 + x_1R_7) + L_8 + y_1R_8 \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 3(b): Send \(r_3 = q_3 \left( y_3 - \frac{r}{l} \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 4(a): Gen \(q_4 \leftarrow \mathbb{F}_p\)Â and send \(H_4 = q_3^{-1} l \left( R_{\text{sum}}(L_1, \dots, R_4) \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 4(b): Send \(r_4 = q_4 \left( x_4^{-1} \right)\)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given \(Z\), we wish to prove: \(\mathcal{L} = \left\{(l, r) \in \mathbb{F}^2_p \ | \ Z = lL_6 + rR_6 \right\}\)
- Step 5: Gen \(q \leftarrow \mathbb{F}_p\), send \(T = q \left( Z + \sum_{i=1}^{4}r_iH_i \right), \ t = \left( q - \frac{x_2^{-1}x_4^{-1}}{l} \cdot c \right) \)
\(T\)
Lin2-Selector Proof
\(L_5\)
\(R_5\)
\(L_6\)
\(R_6\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_7\)
\(R_7\)
\(L_8\)
\(R_8\)
\(L_1\)
\(R_1\)
\(L_2\)
\(R_2\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_3\)
\(R_3\)
\(L_4\)
\(R_4\)
\(H_2\)
\(H_3\)
\(H_4\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_3\)
\(y_3\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(y_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(x_1\)
\(x_2^{-1}\)
\(1\)
\(1\)
\(y_2^{-1}\)
\(x_4^{-1}\)
- Given a proof \(\Pi = \left\{ \{r_i, H_i\}_{i \in [4]}, T, t \right\}\), we need to check the following
- \(tW + cR \stackrel{?}{=} T\) where \(W := \left(Z + \sum_{i=1}^{4}r_iH_i\right), \ R := R_{\text{sum}}(L_1, \dots, R_8) \)
\(T\)
Lin2-Xor Membership Proofs
By Suyash Bagad
Lin2-Xor Membership Proofs
Brief overview of the Lin2-Xor based Membership NIZK protocol.
