Check PID cuts
- proton PID variables (PROBNNp) for Run I KK seem to have a cut already applied.
- See here the comparison between efficiencies after a cut PROBNNp < 0.9 and :
- This came up when we were calculating efficiencies in order to have a rough estimate of the impact of these cuts in the fit yields.
Below all years
Bs2KsKK Monte Carlo
DD-PrincipalPeak














DD-SecondaryPeak














LL-PrincipalPeak














LL-SecondaryPeak














B2KsKK Data
DD-PrincipalPeak
Below all years














DD-SecondaryPeak














LL-PrincipalPeak














LL-SecondaryPeak














Check PID cuts for 2018 SecondaryPeak
B2KsKK Data
Below log scale
DD-SecondaryPeak

B2KsKK Data
DD-SecondaryPeak

B2KsKK Data
Below log scale
LL-SecondaryPeak

B2KsKK Data
LL-SecondaryPeak

Check MVA cuts for 2018 SecondaryPeak
Bs2KsKK Monte Carlo

DD-SecondaryPeak
Bs2KsKK Monte Carlo
LL-SecondaryPeak

B2KsKK Data

Below log scale
DD-SecondaryPeak
B2KsKK Data

B2KsKK Data
Below log scale
LL-SecondaryPeak

B2KsKK Data
LL-SecondaryPeak

B2KKKS Homemade Fit
1. Fits without any additional cuts respect to the ANAnote, i.e., here PROBNNp > 0.9

DD-SecondaryPeak




LL-SecondaryPeak



Let's compare the ANAnote yields with those from our homemade fits.

Homemade fit:

ANAnote fit:
DD-SecondaryPeak

2. Fits changing the PROBNNp > 0.9 cut by PROBNNp > 0.5




LL-SecondaryPeak






DD-SecondaryPeak
3. Fits for 2018, adding the MVA cuts on top of the PROBNNp > 0.5 cut

LL-SecondaryPeak
DD-SecondaryPeak



1.
1.
2.
3.
LL-SecondaryPeak



1.
2.
3.












B2KKKS efficiencies after PROBNNp < 0.5 cut
Results before the cut (ANAnote)
Bs2KSKK-Secondary peak
Results after the cut PROBNNp < 0.5


Results before the cut (ANAnote)
Bd2KSKK-Secondary peak
Results after the cut PROBNNp < 0.5


Back up
Proton
Proton


























Silicon Tracker
Outer Tracker
Beam pipe
TT
T1-T3
Check PID cuts
By Sebastian Ordoñez
Check PID cuts
- 150