GHENT, BELGIUM

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AS A SERVICE  | www.TMaaS.eu

Wifi: Public-Mobile / WelkomInGent!

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                         5'

advisory board input       30'

conclusion                          10'

 

short intro

why are you here?     

expectations

Introduction

https://www.tmaas.eu/advisory-board

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                        5'

advisory board input       30'

conclusion                          10'

 

$ 15.000

$ 55.000

$ 3.000.000

IS THIS WHAT WE REALLY NEED ?

IS THIS WORTH THE INVESTMENT ?

 

 

AND WHY DO WE TRY

TO COMPETE WITH ..

 

 

DON'T COMPETE!

COLLABORATE! CHALLENGE!

 

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AS A SERVICE

www.TMaaS.eu

 

No need to invest

for years.

 

 

in rooms.

In camera's.

In screens.

Just subscribe.

 

 

BIG DATA CLOUD STORAGE

OUTPUT

#source

#transport mode

#location

#time

OPEN DATA API

OUTPUT

@VERKEERGENT

INPUT

PROCESS

supported by

= City of Ghent

+ 8 world-class partners

City of Ghent

+ 3 other cities in the world

New York, US - Winnipeg, Canada - Copenhagen, Denmark - Cologne, Germany - Brussels, Belgium - Flemish traffic control centre, Belgium - Eindhoven, The Netherlands - Köln, Germany - Miami, US - San Pedro Garcia, Mexico - Debrecen, Hungary - Juiz de Fora, Brasil - Pisa, Italy - Dnipro, Ukraine - New Hamshire, US - Porto, Portugal - Selangor, Malaysia - Los Angeles, US - Paris, France - Kentucky, US - Rotterdam, The Netherlands - Chemnitz, Germany - United Nations – Working Party for Road Transpord - Oxfordshire County, UK - Hungarian Public Road Company - Vlaams Instituut voor Mobiliteit - Wisconsin Department of Transportation, US - Haifa, Israel - Ramat-Gan, Israel - State of Vermont, US - Texas Department of Transportation, US - Tirana, Albania - Waze - Atlanta Regional Commission, US - Miraflores, Peru - Tres de Febrero,
Buenos Aires, Argentina -Louisville, US - 

Text

Groupe SANEF, France - Moreno, Buenos Aires, Argentina - Transport For London, UK - Montreal, Canada - GodTech S.A., Guadalajara, Mexicon  - Florianopolis, Brazil - Las Vegas, US - Southlake, Texas - Cobb County Department of Transport, US - Muscatine, Iowa - Inglewood, Canada  - Regional Municipality of York, UK - City of Oakland, US - Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada - California Department of Transportation - City of Toronto, Canada - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, US - Hillsborough MPO Metropolitan Planning for Transportation, UK - Iowa Department of Transportation, US - Stockholm, Zweden - Wisconsin Department of Transportation, US - Línea Amarilla S.A.C. (LAMSAC), Peru - Brossard, Quebec, Canada - Utrecht, Nederland - Lake County Department of Transportation, US - Grey County, Canada - Lakeland, Florida, US - São Paulo, Brasil - Montevideo, Uruguay - Quito, Ecuador - Xalapa, Mexico - Medellin, Colombia - Tampa, Florida, US - Delaware Department of Transportation, US

INPUT

PROCESS

OUTPUT

GHENT

INPUT

PROCESS

OUTPUT

COPENHAGEN

INPUT

PROCESS

OUTPUT

SOFIA

 

INPUT

PROCESS

OUTPUT

KIGALI

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AS A SERVICE

|  ADVANTAGES

 

 

MOBILITY EXPERTS HAVE THEIR HANDS FREE.

TO BE MOBILITY EXPERTS

 

 

PAY LESS.

 

 

OPERATE WHEREVER AND WHENEVER YOU WANT

 

 

NOT DEPENDING ON CAMERAS. ROOMS. SCREENS

YOU CAN START RIGHT AWAY.

 

 

EXCHANGE DATA. EXCHANGE EXPERIENCES.

ALL HAVE SAME DATA STANDARDS.

 

 

ALWAYS THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY. ALWAYS.

BE READY FOR MAAS, SELF-DRIVING, IN-CAR TECH.

 

 

COME CLOSER TO YOUR INHABITANTS.

             

 

 

LEVEL OUT THE MATURITY DIFFERENCES

IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BETWEEN CITIES.

 

 

LEVEL OUT THE MATURITY DIFFERENCES

IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BETWEEN CITIES.

 

 

THE FUTURE ?

INTENTIONS

WHY CITIES ?

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                        5'

advisory board input       30'

conclusion                          10'

 

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                        5'

advisory board input       30'

conclusion                          10'

 

Issues

Project Management partner left after project approval

Partner Waylay indicated no long be able to take up architect role

Partnership agreement: difficult negotiations on IP

Project owner resigns

Partner Barco leaving the consortium

4 months without finance manager

Risks

partners get into financial problems with personnel due to late partnership agreement

Partnership agreement: difficult negotiations on IP

communication with Tomtom harder (Berlin)

audits of external cities already started without clear consensus within the project

People on payroll without clear insight in workload

no clear requirements framework

Architect role might not be understood correctly by partner

failing to meet first milestone in monitoring plan

Unclarity about patent BE201605765A

Other companies claiming & commercialising TMaaS

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                        5'

advisory board input       30'

conclusion                          10'

 

SCOPE

COMMUNICATON

CONTACT BETWEEN ADVISORY BOARD AND PARTNERS

OTHER PROJECTS

WEBSITE

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

RISKS

ROLES

BUSINESS MODEL

CONCEPT

PARTNERSHIP

MARKET POTENTIAL

ROLE OF THE ADVISORY BOARD

FINANCES

REPLACEMENT FOR BARCO

Advisory Board 20/06/2018

introduction                       10'

the TMaaS concept           15'

project management       20'

issues - risks                        5'

advisory board input      30'

conclusion                          10'

 

Conclusions - 20.06.2018

items to be answerd by the project

 

Adaptations needed for next meeting?

 

Constitution of the board

no requirements framework

failing to meet the first milestone from the UIA monitoring plan

partners get into financial problems with personnel due to late partnership agreement

people on the payroll of the project, while performing significantly less than assigned

harder to involve TomTom, as they are Berlin-based

the architect role is split up between persons

audits of external cities already started without clear consensus within the project

new financial coordinator + manager leaves

supported by

www.tmaas.eu

@TMaaS_eu

info@tmaas.eu

TMaaS Advisory Board - 20/06/2018

By Pieter Morlion

TMaaS Advisory Board - 20/06/2018

  • 1,203