Animal v Artifact

Summary

  • 8 participants with all 6 presentations

Words > Baseline

  • Can use the 'Full_Fstat'

Words > Baseline

  • Mean B-val > 0

Reaction Times

  • Take all RT Coeffs and average them

Artifact - Animal

Artifact - Animal

Artifact - Animal pVal

Artifact - Animal; p < .05

Summary

  • No region of Animal > Artifact
  • Artifact > Animal is shaky

AVA Glove RSA Maps

  • Used GLOVE word vectors
  • Same color scale for all participants
  • 12 mm searchlight
  • Mean subtract average pattern for each participant
  • Correlation distance

AVA101

AVA102

  • Only 1 session

AVA103

AVA104

AVA105

AVA107

AVA108

AVA109

  • Had mistake of many repeats
  • Two sessions

AVA110

AVA111

AVA112

  • Had 1 session

Mean AVA

Intraclass Correlation

(Noise ceilings)

Animal

Artifact

  • Exclude AVA101 (motion) and AVA109 (wrong task files)
  • 12 mm searchlight, and Pearson correlation coefficients
  • Both of these maps on the same scale

Compared with CAT study

AVA

CAT

Animal

Artifact

*all on same scale

Title Text

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Morbi nec metus justo. Aliquam erat volutpat.

Animal v Artifact

By smazurchuk

Animal v Artifact

  • 37